What conflicts is decanonized. Like Verhaiden’s original run in “Aliens”. This is also true for a franchise, such as Star Wars. However, NONE of the examples I have given has any contradictions with the basic canon. In this list, the works are distributed at the level according to the principle “because”. That is, even by the criterion of contradictions to the main canon, the distribution is invalid. So “Out of the Shadows” does not contradict ANY of the films. I repeat, I read all this. The conditional “AvP: Dead Space” does not contradict ANY story inside the Xenoverse in ANY way, simply because it is the same separate and independent story as, for example, “Aliens: Dead Orbit”. At the same time, “Dead Orbit” lies quietly inside the main canon, but “Dead Space” fits into the non-canon for no apparent reason.
Once again, the presence of Predators in the Alien world and the commonality of this universe as a Xenoverse is an objective fact, at least because the events in which Predators were one of the main actors are directly mentioned in the canonical ENCYCLOPEDIC material on the “ALIEN” franchise (WY Report). Plus, this material is listed by Andrew in the main canon.
Ridley Scott can say whatever he wants. He is not the creator of the universe (yes, he made a significant contribution to its film realization, but he DID NOT CREATE the universe). Moreover, according to his own words, he has not watched ANY FILM IN THE FRANCHISE, EXCEPT FOR HIS OWN. The universe was invented and formed by O’Bannon, Shusett, Giger and Cobb. Scott embodied THEIR IDEAS, adding his own to them. Ridley is a great director. Was. Once. But the titular monster was NOT invented by HIM. The characters were NOT invented by HIM. And the concept of the universe was NOT invented by HIM.
And he is also not the owner of the franchise, and he NEVER WAS.