I guess we are all mature enough to just use our devices to Google of what a “Karen” is suppse to be in popular culture. Try starting being smart by looking for the specific figure of speech of “(one) being / not being a Karen.”. Good luck.
Eurpeans: Your first take on your freedom
Cherry picking, taking things out of context and logical fallacy much?
The sith are bad after your belief and is a good thing…your impression. Ok, start making this that way on society, on being malevolent and negative and bad and harmful way in your ways because that is what they ultimately do, and see where that takes you down the line. LeL.
I’m asking why stereotyping people based on their name is considered ok, morally? How is that any better than making fun of people named Laquisha if you think about it? Does pop culture = morally acceptable?
Nope the way you put it is extreme. And nobody likes extremes. You do try to paint me as being extreme for trying to be altruistic…as you prove by your interpretations and takes of my comments, in the most humane way possible, which is wrong on so many levels.
Why is a homeless amputee out of context or a logical fallacy? Do homeless amputees not exist in this scenario? If so, why?
A true altruistic act has consequences to yourself thus voiding any ulterior motives, make sense yet?
Nope, I was givving an example that the homeless person you talk about, despite them being without arms and leggs are still able and capable to live a decent life and is good to support them in any way.
Again, cherry-picking and taking things out of context? Is this a sport to you as it is for the predator to hunt?
And why do you put it or emphasize the potential consequences in negative or bad way? What is the deal with you? You can help however you can possibly and that’s that. You don’t go to extremes like you claim to do with that example.
But you said if they have arms and legs they can achieve their own goals without your assistance. Sounds selfish to me…?
Thanks for supporting the thread James Cameron. In any way you can. 😂
1 Like
Again taking things in the wrong direction, do you take texts ad literam every time? Or is this a mischievous way of you twisting things around? A sport, again.
There are an infinite number of ways you could be helping homeless amputees, what do you mean?
Again deflecting. Is “homeless people have arms and legs and can achieve their own goals without my assistance” an altruistic statement?
I never said it. You can help them while they have and don’t have their arms or legs. What are you on and insinuating about?
This thread is a very philosophical thread. Its relatable , parts of it is simplified other parts a lot less and very misunderstood but still in the same high level of thought.
Good to see some head scratching.
1 Like
PS: as long as I would like to sit and chat more now, and deal with what it looks to be your arrogant behind, not mine. I have to go and have dinner, and will be leaving my device home to charge. Here you go, have a piece of honesty and communication.
Talk to you all alter. And take care Felicia, if you don’t like Karen, there are alternatives. 😂
PS: stay safe out there and vigilant with Covid-19, and see you soon folks. As Spock usually said “Peace, love and prosper.”.
Dw same moral question in regards to discriminating against names applies whether or not you refer to people as karens, jamals, laquishas, abduls, etc
Nothing ties people together and they have no interest in investing in someone they share nothing with, all the down to your common stereotypes IE your dislike of people named Karen and inability to communicate with others on social media without getting banned lel.
Notions of united harmony could well work within a small community in which everyone knows and cares about each other and actively wants to contribute to the community as a whole rather than just themselves but the larger you make the group the more estranged people become from their neighbours and the more people’s priorities are split. Then all those evil traits that you disagree with come out when the cracks begin to show and the communist government suddenly becomes authoritarian. Who could have seen that coming? The only way to make socialism work on a large scale is through tyranny, which makes it an oxymoron at best and a lie at worst.
- Dw same moral question in regards to discriminating against names applies whether or not you refer to people as karens, jamals, laquishas, abduls, etc
Nothing ties people together and they have no interest in investing in someone they share nothing with, all the down to your common stereotypes IE your dislike of people named Karen and inability to communicate with others on social media without getting banned lel.
Notions of united harmony could well work within a small community in which everyone knows and cares about each other and actively wants to contribute to the community as a whole rather than just themselves but the larger you make the group the more estranged people become from their neighbours and the more people’s priorities are split. Then all those evil traits that you disagree with come out when the cracks begin to show and the communist government suddenly becomes authoritarian. Who could have seen that coming? *
Well with all that stupid and nonsense splattered there, I may as well as reserve my right to call out any person who is idiotic, absurd, not too brilliant or bright when it comes to a topic.
Is a known human right to have freedom of expression and within that freedom of expression is in my civic and also ethical and moral duty to call out bullshit and people who practice the notion of “bullshit”. I also reserve myself the right to express what I know and deduce and feel as an outcome of cognition and process what is truthful, empirical and proven by actual data at hand or any other means as historical facts and the types.
Given your idiotic ramblings and absurdity I have every right to speak out about what you proven to be. And take the information as it is at hand (look at your ramblings on the topic).
Now, if we think about it, the same principle kind of applies to formulations like “Karen” or “Ken” or “Felicia”, you name it. As they are characterised as being most basic in the way of thinking(means "don’t get those types of people out of their comfort zones or back yards otherwise they will give you idiotic and unfounded and unbased reasons for that), not too comprehensive when it comes to the extents or complexity of some problem that are being put on the table or the inquisitive types, where they don’t see outside their dogma or way they were brought up as well as sending a message of subtle and mischievous sense of superiority when it comes to other people outside their back yard(community, town, city, county or state). And frankly you kind of fit the profile.
Those mentioned by you there are not a stereotypes but a category of people who are thick headed, and everybody can see that when it comes to arguments and delirious habbit you manifested on this thread.
Categorising people based on sets of traits like intelligence and level of intellect and their education level is not discriminatory in anyway, as with this you can find out easily on what people need to improve on as things need to be constructive.
In your case being the simple solution of maybe getting out of your comfort zone and back yard a little and not being a whining pain in the neck for start, and getting out there and actually getting a cope of what life actually is and maybe ending up not wasting all your potential as an individual trying to make others sound wrong for the benefit of you not loosing an argument.
I am running out of time and patience to offer you explanations in regards to why I chose to call you like that. In the end is simple, you chose for yourself in the stupid way you manifested yourself to include yourself for me into the “Karen” category. And is your choice to improve yourself if you don’t wanna be judged and seen like that by others (another shocking reality of life you might have missed is that people judge and will judge others no matter what, based on information of different types, and nobody can change that…people just do it and is hypocritical not to see things that way - meaning saying stuff like “oh I don’t judge!” bullshit, everybody does and is a fact).
So take your pillow hold it hard to your face and cry because if reality upsets you there is an empirical truth about how things juat are. Hope you don’t cry a river over this…keep up a good, positive view, and try to do your best tod efy the odds first for you and then for others.
Yikes all that and you managed to say nothing of value aside from some angry ranting.
There’s a reason people grow out of such ideation; there’s a certain justifiable cynicism you end up with that can only really be understood when you’ve observed human nature for long enough to realise that certain patterns are inevitable. Much like you kicking and screaming rather than presenting an actual counter argument in response that isn’t an attack on character lmao.
You know, despite what people want to say about castro, he genuinely wanted a progressive socialist country as well as a truely democratic one. He soon realized after taking power there was no way to do both without becoming a dictator and then had to choose which to embrace. He went with social reforms and the rest is history.
I’m dying, please continue mr. 5000 IQ humanitarian.
Dude, you are the one who lacks the property and ability to read and comprehend what he is reading. Go back to school if you have trouble understanding things…primary? Secondary?
What do you want me to do aside point the massive gaps and flaws in the way you were brought up and educated? Get out more, experience life, see and meet new people, cultures, have new experiences and then we will talk.