Extinct Humans

#81

No fuckin feathers!!! There’s no fuckin way they had feathers! Thats ridiculous! I don’t give a flying fornication what some pencil-necked virgin who’s never left their lab in a protected, woke-ass bubble of a univershitty says! Sure, the Archeopteryx had feathers and shit, but that was basically a bird. Theres no way I’m ever gonna be convinced that those very elephant/hippopotamus/cattle-like creatures had fuckin feathers!

And I’m not THAT fat. Its the management at Chuck E. Cheese’s that suggested I’m too fat for their rides. I tried explaining to them that I identify as a small child (my wife always says thats my mental capacity), so therefore I should be able to ride the rides and shit, butnsince I’m actually midde-aged, I can also drink their watered down beer!.. they disagreed. So I threw a toddler-tantrum and poooed on the floor. Consequently, I am now banned for life.

1 Like
#82

That’s how I see the cloning of other human species. There will be much individual suffering before thay can thrive to some extend.

But i don’t see a point in it. They’ll be second class life forms in regards to present day humans. Their brains will not be equiped to process current information. Doing it for science does not cut it for me

#83

Lol. Furry dinos

#84

c3a9daf1f1889e00cf9026ff1b31256f
c3a9daf1f1889e00cf9026ff1b31256f918×683 30.3 KB

Hehehehehehehehehe… furry.

1 Like
#85

image

2 Likes
#86

Radical, dude.

But on a serious note, would they be able to tell by looking at the DNA? Maybe I’m stretching it, but if they determined that the flуers had feathers, maybe they could have determined if non-flyers had hairs.

1 Like
#87

Look, anything is possible, but there are several that just bear zero properties of birds at all. Look at the Platypus. That thing’s a fuckin mess. And whales are technically mammals, etc. So its possible, but some are far less likely than others. Like the pterodactyl, sure, I can see that having feathers, but a Diplodocus? Never. The Styracosaurus? Laughable. The Velociraptor? Maybe. Looks pretty stupid though. Has much more in common with a predatory lizard in its physical appearance, based on its bones. Its head, arms, claws on its hands and feet are far closer to lizards.

Just like humans and orangutans. Sure, theres a little similarity here and there, but in reality, its not much.

#88

Need or function dictates adaptation. Feather are a stretch, but fur is a possibility if dinos inhabited cooler environments

#89

Yeah. The mammoth is a prime example

#90

Yup. So maybe there were dinos that constantly lived in cooler environments and first it was the nose hair, then the butt hair and finally furry dinos

I wonder if the can compare certain genes betweens elephant and mammoth or house pig and pred pig and figure out which ones are responsible for fur. And then do the same with dino bones from different environments

#91

1502b1eb089d70f315c9bc3eeb683bb2cc-27-joe-exotic-youtube.rsquare.w1200
1502b1eb089d70f315c9bc3eeb683bb2cc-27-joe-exotic-youtube.rsquare.w12001200×1200 178 KB

I’m a hairy ass dino-sore, mother fucker!!

#92

thumb_my-little-brother-how-do-i-get-girls-to-like-58059727~2

1 Like
#93

🍆🦖🤠

#94

No both are different feathers and hair

#95

Agreed, but maybe there still a way to tell based on dna and cross referencing with other species (boar vs swine)

#96

🤷

#97

Fr there’s always that guy that jumps in like UH, [PUSHES UP GLASSES] T-REX HAD FEATHERS

1 Like
#98

Ya, cause i saw it on Google

1 Like
#99

Feathers no feathers, I just want a T Rex.

#100

Maybe they can be miniaturized, like doggos 😁

1 Like