classic example of not knowing what your talking about and assuming
If everyone could afford a super car, which one would you go for?
Now who idolizes Andrew Tate XD
Either way, why would I give a shit about what some random millionaire says? I aināt broke, and the fact that thereās people in the world with more money than me doesnāt change that. I wager despite all their cash, I could cull them if I felt the need to.
Classic example of expecting everyone to follow Andrew Tate religion.
just say your wrong and have done with it
classic example of trying to comment when you donāt understand what your talking about, again. get some sleep jim
Iām not wrong because Iām not broke and I donāt care how some dipshit with dosh qualifies ābrokeā XD
you thought brokie meant something it didnāt. so your wrong. i donāt know how to make it any more simple for you jim
Ah yes
I donāt understand the fact that some guy thinks broke is sub-millionaire
Meanwhile, you are incapable of understanding simple literary devices used to create humor, e.g. irony and whimsy. Youāre really boring to argue with.
regardless of what he thinks, you were wrong whilst trying to be clever and argue something you knew nothing about. well done
compared to someone who just argues for the sake of it with no knowledge of what he is even trying to argue about. stop spending your life here jim. go outside
Bruh.
Just cos I donāt keep up with the latest gen z urban-dictionary faggotry, or give a flying fuck what rich people say XD
You genuinely attribute a concrete meaning to this word? I need no more evidence that you are suffering from severe brain damage the likes of which would put Phineas Gage to shame. There, thereās an obscure reference from my time that you wonāt understand. Does that make you an idiot? No, youāre an idiot for all the other dumb shit you say XD
I bid you good day, sir.
stop trying to argue something you donāt have a clue about then, this is why people call you stupid Jim.
maybe you should, you might not look like such an ageing backwards boomer trying to argue for the sake of it then.
Aight back from the shitter, now where were we? Ah yes.
Youāre arguing about the difference between the intuitive and actual definition of the gen-z slang term ābrokieā which was coined by some rando with money like itās actually significant XD
And you have the nerve to call me a loser lmfao
Yes, 4 people. On an online internet forum which holds no significance to my everyday life (on most days - usually I just check and respond once in the morning, once in the evening unless someone else is active at the same time and I can have a real-time discussion, which is always fun even if the other participant is unoriginal and boring as fucc)
Mm hm, and what was I just saying about unoriginality?
Couple things you would know if you didnāt have your head up your own ass: One, Iām old. Weāve established this. Two, I love arguing for the sake of it. Weāve also established this. Three, I am not ageing backwards because I refuse to participate in the unfunny bullshit young people find hilarious or significant. Refusing to try my darndest to think, talk and act like an imbred is nothing to be upset about, and as a result Iām not upset about it.
just go out side Jim, your desperate attempts to argue over nothing are pathetic.
Youāre participating, you fucking moron XD
In fact, youāre purpoting the argument. Jesus fuck, ever heard of something called āhypocrisyā?
my replies just showed how fucking painfully stupid you are
This is just too funny to read lmao! Damn you two! š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£š¤£
Your replies just showed how painfully fucking stupid you are.