Exactly im talking about and offline bot mode not some COD style campaign, could the offline have some kind of story to it yes it can
PLEASE JUST MAKE A SOLO OR STORY MODE ALREADY!!!
1 Like
Yes, because bigger company that was made famous for producing Halo, this is Illfonic’s third game with an overall employee staff of 78.
Destiny 2 also bombed because of the fact they lied in the first game about 10+ years of fun and then dropped it after three? The campaign was bare bones honestly, And the biggest money grab in the first and second game was they dropped dlc’s to add to the campaign and charged you $60 and you could no longer access old DLC’s you had unless you bought the new one. That’s why it made more money because it forced players to by DLC’s or you couldn’t play anymore.
Destiny started out with 25 million players and dropped to just over a million in its last DLC because they killed off most of their player base pulling that bs.
Destiny 2 was a reskin of the old and same gimmick after they said it would be different. Game made considerably less money second time around and had less than a million starting out. So, they literally gave out some of their DLC’s free because the game in its first year or two was at the numbers its previous game was at at its end.
In all honesty the tactics they pulled was an outright scam and only reason they made a lot of money was by forcing people to by the dlc after hooking them. That was not right at all and I stopped supporting them after they did that
This is 100% spot on. If you want an online only game then fine but make the online worthwhile and actually good. But no as is the case with nearly every online game they release as broken, bare bones garbage that we have to wait years after purchase for the game to be somewhat decent like avengers, For Honor, siege, DBD,
Anthem, sea of thieves, this game and so many more. If you ask me that’s not a game. That’s a scam. And we keep buying into that shit. I’m starting to drift away from those kind of games now. Because they’re always sold off the premise and not what the game actually is.
1 Like
Player count is 15 so i think its more than that
And to be honest there will probably not be an offline mode till player base is increased and Que times fixed. Already with private matches existing ques times are high. Adding a offline would finish off the game because why play multiplayer with 10 minute ques when you can play private or campaign. Right now is not the time or place with the ques the way they are. I am not opposed to single player, but I am opposed to it being done right now until other things are fixed.
2 Likes
Just now realizing that this is a old post🤦🏽♂️
1 Like
That is still breathing
2 Likes
That I can agree on. I just don’t understand the people that think it should never come to the game not even at the end of its life cycle. Why would you not want to expand your game further? Baffling to me.
2 Likes
An offline mode would have to have a books worth of content come to think of it. Time challenges might be interesting but the more simplistic it is -the more disappointed people will be and the more people will be wanting more content instead.
Hell if there were interactive comics in the game that updates weekly, then i think I would be sold.
2 Likes
I agree, even though with the companies track record they should have at least considered it before launch, but regardless having another online only game with annoying wait times and nothing different of missions for fireteam or even maps, the game does need a higher player base but the way the game is heading there wont even be any reason to update the multiplayer cause everyone would be gone
1 Like
Right, like of you dont want the mode then thats you others want it and would actually play it, and I can’t stand the excuse of theres no replayability…like do you only watch movies once since you know what gonna happen…I think not. Like for me and people I know they had WAY more fun doing private matches, and the single player challenges in F13 more then playing online, yes it had its issue but it was fun that was the main thing, especially for me as well, and in my opinion the virtual cabin was so fun alittle hard at time to figure out but still fun and that could have been a whole game in it’s own lol
1 Like
I loved those challenges. It was the mode I felt the most like Jason in. Multiplayer was a ton of fun. But Jason was completely beserk in it. Yet the challenges felt like the Jason that stalks and plans and hunts like he does in the first parts of the movies. They were also nice little nods to the films too. I can easily see them doing something like that some point in the future as they’ve already had experience with it. Challenges that are scenes from the movies or something like F13 was so for example one challenge could be a recreation of Dutch Vs Predator.
1 Like
Not the end of its life cycle though. I dont think anyone cares anymore after they announce they’re shutting down servers. But otherwise that time’s better spent improving the foundation so the game doesnt ACTUALLY die rather than abandoning ship and saying its dead
Yes. 0 replay value screw learning all the lines.
Perhaps. But at the end of the game’s life cycle they’ve already done what they can for the multiplayer so it’s not like it would be detracting from it at that point. It would be a thank you gift of sorts. At least it would be something people can come back to once the game is finished and give people just that little bit more to offer.
1 Like
Yes!!! Plus even if the game didn’t die offline mode could be for people who either don’t have the best internet, maybe they just wanna have a quick game, or maybe they aren’t the best player and don’t wanna be harrassed by their teammates who play this game as if their life depends on it
1 Like
Yup there’s a lot of positives to it and the only negative I’ve seen is that it would “detract from the multiplayer” but how true is that exactly? We know it wouldn’t require the entire team if it was a simple bot mode of the already existing modes which is what it will most likely be. So that would still leave a majority of people working on multiplayer and overall it could actually add to the multiplayer as I’ve already said by improving the AI and adding AI to replace rage quitters.
But then you could say “well it would reduce the amount of people playing online!” This is true. But at the same time it would also add to the people playing online. It’ll get more players to try the game, they’ll try the offline mode and then they’ll go onto the multiplayer. It will take people from the multiplayer and add to them as well. So that’s not a complete negative.
And lastly there is the “but it won’t be good it would just be a one and done” honestly this argument is entirely down to personal preference. For some people it’s true and for others it’s not. I know I still play the offline of F13 from time to time. If it didn’t have an offline mode I don’t think I would ever go back to that game because sometimes you just can’t be assed with online. That and because little kiddies kept teaming up with Jason.
1 Like
It takes them months to give us 3 masks and a recolor. They have no AI programmer and have had the opening available since launch lol. The AI we have now just spazzes out trying to path to the alarm if something is infront of it. AI players is a shitshow
Just like pred dogs if I actually thought they were capable of making something thats not a joke and just more filler for this game, I would be ok with predator dogs
Pls tell me you didn’t just say that.
Pls provide at least a point.
Look i disagree. Most games as a services release with a lack of content so this is normal. But besides that…
Whats your point.
Your saying it shoyld of released working cleaner. So therefore we shouldn’t work on it at all? Shouldn’t that just that push the devs TO prioritize multiplayer to fix it to whay it shpuld of been?
Ya. So lets fix that and fix the multiplayer and make it worth it.
Ya but people complained that the story sucked.
AND YOU THINK ILLFONIC CAN SURPASS BUNGIE! A TRIPLE A STUDIO THAT MADE HALO!
Your missing the point.
A. My point was that in order to get single player mode there was a cost (I loved Outbreak and I’m happy to have gotten it. But I don’t trust Illfonic with that same idea) . How much is it going to cost Illfonic to get their single player.
And we pay for those games (without single player… because we want multiplayer, not a siigleplayer experience) under the promise of free updates (alongside paid dlc of course). And if they don’t hold those promises then we boycott them. Its an investment. Its not for everyone, but it is for some.
Because we thought’d it be like D1 instead of the casaul-fest it was.
So your claiming the devs aren’t putting the work in.
Explain that logic to me.
The devs are putting in half the work, and the higher ups (who pay them) don’t do anything about it, even though the playbase is complaining daily, even though they could be getting more bang for their buck by having the devs put the work in like they should.
How does that line up.
Unless the devs are putting the work in but are having a harder time than they should because of their release schedule. So they need to change the release schedule. Which I support.
Yes they should definitly fix the way they do content to result in less bugs and introduce more dynamic gameplay. I’m not sayimg the game is flawless.
Do you not know about the dark ages of DBD? When it first launched and how aweful the game was?
Because thats essentially where PHG is. In its dark age stage alongside where dbd was.
No you don’t know what the dark ages are oh god man.
Heres day one release for survivor. Do a gen. See a killer. Spam god loops.
Heres day one killer. lose. If you some how manage to get a down camp them to death. With 3 killers (like phg) 4 survivors (like phg) and 3 maps (like phg)
The dark ages of dbd are nothing compared to PHG because killer was nigh un-playable because of how op the survivors are. At least with phg they have to know what they’re doing to own a pred which is rarer than you think on condole at the very least.
And you trust them to do single player?
Also all games as a services start out as buggy messes (especially those made by small teams). Its an investment.
OH GOD YOU REALLY HAVE BEEN SPARED THE HORRORS OF THE DARK AGE!
DBD has had massive improvements. By guess what FOCUSING ON THE MULTIPLAYER!
As of now, yes. But given a few years time if the game is still kicking about then who’s to say they haven’t hired someone for the AI and improved it? I’m looking at this from what we could get going into the future. Not what we could get now. But yes as of right now the mode would be horrendous. In the future if we get improved AI? Who knows.
Dude I’m tired of arguing with you, if you want to keep paying these devs to keep giving you half assed games thats you, regardless of dark ages of games like I said yea DBD was buggy but guess what their player base stayed PHG player base is leaving. People want what they what if you dont want it then that’s on you but dont say adding modes will take away from the multiplayer when the multiplayer should have been 100% good since that’s all the game has for it and they didnt do that. They are already losing players so them actually trying to do offline mode wont hurt them with player drops since thats already happening. Players want more to their games if you dont that’s you but dont be mad at us who dont wanna just give a company our money for half ass work, you can waste your money all you want
1 Like