It’s part of game balance
New game modes are also included in game balance
POLL FOR WHAT WE NEEDDDD
ah lol im not sure if you know this but um im sure you got this for predators 2010 right? thats ment to be the og jungle hunter from 1987 i swear look it up its true. so i mean thats… kinda all ready in the game
Shhhhhhh 🤫
I know Crucified Predator is supposed to be JH87, but If he comes into the game people will maybe shut up about not having JH87
Or just give them the mask call it “beaten” or “broken”
I mean I’d be fine with just getting the mask
I have JH87, but I also what everyone else to have JH87
Also technically Crucified is difference enough to be classified as a new predator class
Crucified is fine, he’s shorter, skinnier, and has chains on his wrists. His face has different markings. His mask damage is in a different location.
It works as far as I’m concern, he’s a different character.
but then if he does then that makes the preordder JH87 worthless…
i disagree
Why… Crucified would probably be a scout variant not a Hunter variant?!
Certainly not a reskin Hunter as he’d be a DLC.
Or an maybe even an Elder variant
That’s a possibility I hadn’t considered. Interesting suggestion.
Because then it doesnt mean anything, if showed off my JH87 skin then it holds no meaning anymore if you can be that predator weither y ou have been there since the start or not then it ruins it.
its the same idea to giving a trophy to someone in last place just cause they showed up.
it ruins the REAL trophy it means fucking nothing now.
Wolf!!! Predator please with his own loadout and duel plasmacasters( on the shoulders like the movie) and make it do damage when you have the long range perk
No you vote for one you vote for both
They are different characters, he’s not Jungle Hunter.
Jungle Hunter is and should always be exclusive. That doesn’t mean Crucified can’t also be in the game. Same goes for the other Pred’s would look alike or are similar. Elder doesn’t invalidate JH and neither does Crucified.
What exactly do you mean?
thats incorrect good sir it is indeed the same character.