Your perception. And not reality…
[All platforms] Game doesn't have any dropping-out of session punishment for abandonment or disconnecting.
Ok prove it then.
Prove to me how that’s not the case.
A lazy tactic btw.
Ppl cant actually come up with anything so they try copying me.
Except your just lying and I’m telling the truth.
Because I have seen the endless amounts of complaints when shit gets to strict or serious for people in video games.
Only those who like to push themselves can handle it.
How you’re blind to this is just sad.
For Honor was dead to begin with just like assassin’s Creed multiplayers were to begin with. How things like the Division was and is and plenty out there. Is one of those titles…that get scrapped in the corner.
For them punishments were and will always be pretexts.
Dead before hitting daylight.
And right now, we cant afford to push any players away.
You get that right?
1 Like
Will not, if you implement ranked and leave quick-match thinking as it is at least.
Is about playing with formulas.
Yes but unlike your mocking response earlier,
It will not be easy to create an ACCURATE ranking system for ft.
You can’t base it off the preds one cause it’s two completely different goals.
Not only that, the game isnt balanced as it is, ft has the complete advantage so the ranks wouldnt be accurate because of that as well.
1 Like
Aside from very few of us, who would actually play ranked in the messy state the game is right now?
I would just to play vs full teams, a full party.
But not so much for the ranking because I feel it wouldnt be accurate given current balance.
Mocking to you, I was being honest when I said to build tribes that users can actually get together, select eachother and fight with eachother based on their choice of members.
Tribes that can also unlock cosmetic content for the defined tribes they belong to (by the dev team let’s say 4 or 5 in number - creativity and lore is key here on names and all).
See how it works with the tribes for predators/hunters and the community behaves and shapes itself. Clashing with eachother in matches(how much scores they gather in the tribe leaderboards).
Afte that, you can take the relatively same formulas and build up squads for users that are fireteams and can choose themselves and play whatever they want and repeat the above idea.
A good refined touch for them would be to reduce the duplicate effect of having 2-3 Dutch(2025) or any other unit of the same type joining a session(brings a bit of filtration and order and more planning to the table for squads).
No. People are already on thin ice with PHG
Restrictions will be the death bed for this game.
The problem is the vast majority of players don’t know how to play the game
2 Likes
If you follow my idea, squads and clans can train adepts by joining stuff like hunt or clash quickmatch. Or any other type of matchmaking modes will come…
That’s another reason why restrictions would frustrate even more people.
And I don’t want to waste my time with people who hack or use glitches to win either.
Or if I see a bunch of big brain Ft squad mates split up across the map
We don’t talk about clash here…
2 Likes
Okay, hunt then. They can organise between themselves, that is the key. Give them the tools and ground to get together and organise.
Massive xp and awards for mentoring inside the tribes/clans/squads.
Or actually the opportunity for the clans and squads to join matches with “regulars”(novice) and they get mentoring points and xp and titles and trophies and medals or whatever, for them playing and actively participating with the non designated players to any squad or tribe.
Good chance for them to spot talents and even go further to recruit.
A Lot of us, from all over the forum have said limiting ft classes would be a good idea.
Especially for stuff like feild medic tho that’s a specialization so those would need a limit too.
However I don’t bashing the rank system purely off of how clans collide is the perfect way to do it.
I actually see the logic behind it, and it’s not a horrible idea.
I just feel it would be too restricted to only a few certain results and players.
I think at that point we could just ask everybody what they think a good ranking system would be.
But in order to actually move forward with this we really need ilfonic to let us know if they’re even planning on adding a rank system.
And to what end.
Wish they would communicate.
Are you talking about restricting classes?
Cause a lot of us have actually said that would help balance.
1 Like
Maybe they read our crap here anyway…
Hope for the best.
(I was not insulting no, being sarcastic as always)
Didnt seem insulting or sarcastic.
I mean I do hope for the best lol.
Cant really do much else.