My point is if you don’t like others dictating how you play don’t dictate others on how they should play
[All platforms] Game doesn't have any dropping-out of session punishment for abandonment or disconnecting.
Why don’t you just keep his profile up on the board even after they left so normal players aren’t subjected to a long after report screen.
Have you ever tested out of curiosity to see how long the profiles stay when everybody starts exiting the lobby of the after-action report? Not even 10 seconds. Tell me how the heck you are able to do anything with that. And in case you have 2 users who need reporting, try to do that and see how it goes…
Why don’t you just
So that you can report them after they left the match… Like I suggested. Just like DBD. Not to mention this is specifically for quitting matches (yes it comes with the benefit of reporting for other issues I realize that). Why not do what Titanfall does and literally every other game and have it be automatic.
I’m not even against the idea of extending lobby time my problem is
There’s no reason to lock people in when you can literally just keep their profiles tacked onto the leaderboard.
There are already solutions out there that don’t require the player being locked into the lobby.
Yes a solution is for the aftermatch screen to be static and still active with the names of everybody that ever was present on that session. Even if others want to leave. And for the screen to be skipable instead of going down via a timer.
Maybe that would work.
Still I don’t see the issue of having a total time for everybody in the aftermatch screen to stay for about 15 seconds. Is not like is some tragedy …
A. People don’t even like to stay for the Predator body but at least you can shoot something. Yet people are supposed to be fine with staying in the menu for 15 seconds?
B. It’s completely unessacary and is a downgrade for the sake of a downgrade. There’s literally no reason to do it.
The reason is for them to be able to report and all that. Is literally impossible to do so for more than one, if that one you actually can report, and I doubt you can because it goes away quick now.
As for the predator body, defending it, well what the fuck man? If that is boring to you or many then why play the game in the first place? The sessions are going too fast even now since you have about 20 minutes for it.
What is also true is the fact that the game feels rushed anyway.
Who the heck dictates what here? Is about balancing and everything. What is with the over the top behavior of not wanting things balanced? Nobody says you shouldn’t play the game, heck even the game has some rules you and all abide to because is a damn game. But that doesn’t mean rules don’t need to be set up in place just for you or anyone to keep dropping out of session like flies with no consequence whatsoever.(oh maybe there is that with the one with no xp award for leaving or disconnecting, meh…something close to zero as consequence).
The fact that you don’t like to be held accountable for the toxic behavior mentioned and the one you hold up to dearly, is somewhat dictating? Can you even see how absurd that looks what you say there?
Yes. But you don’t need to lock people in to fix it.
Let’s compare
Unique PVP between Predator and FT that while cheap is found nowhere else and has some substance.
Cheap cod with cheap guns and cheap A.I that makes me wish I was playing titanfall 2
Yes they’re very similar and completely the same With no meaningful difference.
The A.I are just a buffer to the Predator gameplay. You can’t just throw A.I waves with no Predator and go “look at this totally important gameplay”
They aren’t equivalent.
Plus is this just an attack of people who don’t defuse or is this supposed to actually defend your idea of locking people in?
so that means we should go through boring gameplay. Your telling me that because the game go’s too fast we need to purposely add fluff to our matches. That makes no sense.
Is that even what your saying here?
You mean gameplay or quality? In terms of quality yes it’s bad but I wouldn’t say rushed but that’s generally because I see Game as a service as a deal between dev and player saying that the devs will release a bad game in exchange for free content updates throughout it’s life.
In terms of gameplay I don’t feel it.
Aside the fact that you are dissapointed for your purchase, I see you want to go and play titanfall so much that I must not be taking more of your time and just go and play it.
Second, you either have completed dissonance with the reality of differences or you never played the game ever since you claim that is literally the same but with somewhat difference…but the same as Titanfall 2. Based on your salad of words that you just had there.
Looks to me that you might as well as Co sides this game a bad investment and paly titanfall, CoD or any other cash grab clone rehash out there that is being thrown brainlessly at you for the past decade. (muh, such interesting, so wow - yes, sarcasm).
Well, the AI needs to be more agressive and more worked in terms of behavior, I give you that. It could be easy to set things up since they can borrow code of behavior in comparison to other difficult types of examples out there.
Example: if you played counter-strike, I am sure you managed to bump into the deadly type of A.I. Where they can just give you a headshot / instakill you and…you’re dead. Ah, but that wouldn’t be a buffer anymore and would take your game away, and also the game away from the predator. No fun isn’t it? Well…what do you really want?
Well what the heck would you wanna do? Take the body with you home or and put it on your truck? What else? If you have better ideas well, then share them so the devs know what your pretentious asses want.
The point here is that if you want things challenging like we said with the AI being more agressive AND more agile/aware/smart.
well you wouldn’t be able to get passed the first objective without being killed. I am saying that the missions can be made a bit more interesting along with the work on the A.I. To behave more smart.
Well by saying what I quoted you in the last one here, maybe is better for people not to wish something like COD in the first place. Because is Predator Hunting Grounds, and while some mechanics might help to be pulled out of other games the overall idea of a shooter still stands.
What would take it out of the CoD atmosphere would actually be not to make so many militarized GI Joe type of units. And bring down some of the more non conventional ones. Like you had in Predators. Fighters from all spectrums, a native American background type of blend with a modern soldier, bring a Yakuza, a spetsnaz, a Mercenary, a War Lord…people from the underworld and organized crime.
Oh, yes, but that would work on a reservation type of map, or a city “Concrete Jungle” type of map that I suggested.
The thing is they are constantly bringing content and is good. As well as maps, because it will not end for sure here and now like this…the game. So we need to have patience.
If not man, if you don’t like it and are not patient, you are free to get back to GTA, CoD, Titanfall 2 or whatever since you miss some things so much from there. Maybe you will like microtransactions as well.
" Edit: another alternative would be for the user to still have the list of session participants into their end of session screen that can be interacted with so that the reporting can be done by others. This should be possible even if the users are already gone, dropped-out or leave the after-acrion score screen. The screen can be closed via a push of a button, the “leave” button."
here you go, mentioned your idea. Is still an issue, not a suggestion so it belong here since the function is missing.
Thank you for the participation.
Never said that. I went into this game knowing what to expect because unlike everyone else apparently I understand that games as a service titles release broken.
Straw man. I said defendimg the body made me want to play titanfall. Not that I want to play titanfall.
Straw man.
Me saying the gameplay of Predator versus Fireteam with A.I sprinkled in is the same as surviving a small wave of A I was sarcasm.
Me saying I wish I was playing Titanfall was another way of saying we might as well be playing a better game.
It takes years for games as a service to get good. Some at different rates. Plus where did you get this I’m disappointed part from. Just another straw man.
If I’m playing the defuse mini-game I should be. But I’m not defusing am I. I’m playing the actual PVP in this PVP game that makes it unique and is the whole selling point of the game in the first place.
You do realize not every part of a game is the same quality right?
Straw man. I never said I wanted the A.I completely overpowered. I also never said I wasn’t fine with overpowered A.I. I’m perfectly content just ignoring the defuse. And If I were to fix it I’d remove the defend segment entirely.
We don’t want anything from the devs. We just don’t want to be talk downed apon because we ignore a part of the game that is completely inconsequential to the PVP in a PVP game mode.
Also I like the fact that your response to “is that an attack” is “what do you want” followed by an insult. Am I being trolled right now?
I never said that I wanted it to be more challenging. Or even changed. I never said anything.
Not to mention my response is related to your comment about the time it takes to get into a match. How’d I get an answer that’s not even related to time I have no idea.
Don’t even know where your coming from.
Apparently saying the sessions are going to fast is saying the A.I should be smarter. I feel like your swapped what you were responding about.
You said the matches go to fast.
I said so we should deal with fluff?
Then you say A.I should be smarter with no previous context of anything related to A.I being made smarter.
I don’t want cod.
That’s why I don’t defuse.
I do have patience. Why are we having a conversation about waiting for updates I’m an Illfonic defender I agree with game as a service business model. Games as a service titles are an agreement that the game will be bad but the devs will provide free content until it’s better you don’t need to tell me this.
What are you talking about?
Are you saying because it’s an issue that it’s a bug? That’s not how it works. Not to mention it’s still a suggestion and feedback also covers issues that aren’t bugs. And being an issue doesn’t make it a bug. Or is balance just a massive bug too?
Is an issue and a bug because the thing like this needed to be thought and implemented from start especially after the events from previous titles, that being Friday the 13 and needed to give users the chance to do what I just described it needed doing. Where things don’t work, and the last time I saw bugs being submitted if I remember correctly, the bugs were being submitted via a twitter post or section.
Is part of balancing in the sense that in itself it makes users play more cooperatively and not to screw around. Simple.
Now tell me how this is a straw man since you are keen on calling out straw men out of your head because…you have a hobby maybe.
Be more specific on what the heck your fluff is…straw man.
Also, thanks for the cherry picking you did there. You failed to see the forest because of the trees.
That’s not a bug.
A bug is something happening in the game engine that’s causing a problem. Not something missing.
Again is this a troll?
Ok. What’s your point in mentionimg balance in this way.
Is it a reference to my balance reference? Because If it is you didn’t respond to it properly.
Because your taking things way too seriously and getting things wrong and making assumptions way too much.
Do you even know what a straw man is?
The fluff, being random waves of A.I after the match is decided.
Examples? Please? No? Alright baseless claim.
Let me correct you, is not working as it should because you can’t literally report. Or if you are lucky to even report someone from that awful after action screen is a miracle. Let alone 2 people…3. And you have report just for the sake of…what?
No its working as it should be. There is no report so you can’t report. It’s working as intended. Should there be a report? Yes but that’s not a bug.
Yes when reporting is implemented then it should be fixed.
1 Like
You just cherry picked my replies in total disregard of the whole idea and point I was making. Just look at your reply. Is the best example…are you rumbling just like your did with your :
Lol. That’s in reference to my own sentence.