In a world where every moral thought is subjective
Is forcing others to obey your own subjective moral code (basically laws) objectively wrong?
In a world where every moral thought is subjective
Is forcing others to obey your own subjective moral code (basically laws) objectively wrong?
Depending on the situation yes.
Such as, we force everyone to not kill, if you do youāre punished by the law.
But this is to help maintain order, which is beneficial.
However, forcing someone to say not be gay simply because you think its wrong, thatās bad.
But that also applies to trans people forcing their beliefs and on others.
The only reason theres so many variables, is because there is no true universal good or evil, right or wrong.
And when I say universal, I literally mean the entire universe.
However, we could have global understanding and actually create core beliefs that on what right and wrong.
We kinda have that, but still too many differences.
I might be going off topic, but the problem is people dont think of the larger picture, and of the future, only what they feel, and what immediately affects them.
Too many people dont actually care about others.
Itās a fucking mess.
Anyway, it all depends man. I know it might sound like a cop-out answer, but I believe instead of focusing on right or wrong, things should be assessed on beneficial or detrimental, until we all agree on core principles.
Bc you were about to run some random thread off topic
i c u
Because you said " A world with no objective morality."
How are you going to prevent someone from doing nothing wrong?
Because itās wrong from my subjective view
If some one can feel itās morally right to kill I can feel itās morally right to stop that person
Simple as that
Gasp
Shock
The horror
Regardless it was still your call, so donāt blame me
Thanks for agreeing with me
Cant be if that person literally can do no wrong
You have 0 basis
Simple as.
Youāre trying to subtract zeros rn.
you brought this up dumb nerd
You can use subjective morality to judge some one elseās subjective morality
Itās not rocket science
Seriously why the hell canāt I go
āCold blooded murder is wrong, therefore I should stop some one from doing thatā
You donāt need an objective moral reality to make that conclusion
āI donāt think I have the right to murderā
āI should stop others from killingā
I brought it up but you told me to necro the thread dumbass
This isnāt even a thought that morally crosses your mind if murder isnāt wrong.
Thereās no concept of justice without a concept of Wrong wtf are you doing famalam
yeah I was asking why unless this must really be on your mind
Subjective morality means you can decide that something is wrong.
What your suggesting is the lack of any morals at all
Ya and you can have that based on subjective thoughts on this is wrong according to my subjective views and this is justice based on my subjective views
And if every action is Right then the only outlier is people who aim to prevent actions by imposing their morality over someone elses subjective morality
A. Wrong. Having a world where morality is completely subjective does not mean every action is right. It means itās up to every person to decide their own morals, which include the ability to decide that some actions are immoral to do and other actions are moral.
Nothing is inherently right because that does not exist as an objective standard
B. If everything is inherently right to do, then that includes the ability to deny others the ability to do certain actions. It doesnt magically become the only immoral thing
Which means they are all Right.
This is a dumb hill you are trying to die on
What your doing isnāt making a world where everything is subjective, your making a world where everything is objectively morally right and then saying itās about subjective views. You donāt even understand what subjective views are.
Subjective views canāt be correct. An opinion on a movie cannot be correct. A Subjective view cannot be correct.
You have no understanding of what Subjective is.
The concept of harm isnāt subjective you silly goose
Thanks for proving my point.
Your response was to back up your world based on subjective morallity, by explaining how itās objectively moral.
Your world where every moral thought is subjective, is actually based on objective morals, and shows you donāt, or refuse to understand the concept of subjective morality.
Iāve seen what I needed. Were done.