Has your Sasquatch pelt rug arrived yet? I do recall you telling me that you ordered one from my guy down in Florida.
I’m having one of my butlers fetch my pure silk robe and Jackalope head cane.
Has your Sasquatch pelt rug arrived yet? I do recall you telling me that you ordered one from my guy down in Florida.
I’m having one of my butlers fetch my pure silk robe and Jackalope head cane.
I haven’t ordered one yet , I can’t part with the loch ness monster rug just yet 😒
Ah. Perhaps have some of the commoners build another room for it then? I mean, the world is truly the rich man’s oyster.
We dont have it as good as they think , huh . Did you receive that tutankhamen skull ashtray I sent you yet?
Oh yes it is most excellent! Truly adds something to the 5th lounge room!
As a gesture of appreciation I will send over my architecture design team to work on that room for you, all expenses covered as per usual!
Very much appreciated, I will tell the butler to move the unicorns to the spare two thousand acres 👍🏻
Fatherless-Ness. Vast majority of those in prison grew up in fatherless homes. Fatherless kids are several times more likely to end up in prison, to drop out of school, to commit crime. Fatherless girls also have higher rates of teen pregnancy.
Turns out kids need both a mother and a father for their best chance at a happy successful life. Unfortunately society celebrates single mother hood (which ends up badly for the child and they usually end up on welfare/reliant on government handouts), and attacks men as “dead beat dads” despite never getting the full story. The welfare state that was implemented in the early 60s by LBJ (Mr “I’ll have those ni****s voting Democrat for the next 200 years”) decimated the black community far more than the CIAs crack epidemic. Before the welfare state blacks had a LOWER rate of divorce and single parenthood than whites. Why risk being with a man when the government guarantees you free shit and even more so the more kids you pop out?
We talk about “toxic masculinity” but has anyone ever done any proper research or looked into it? Most of those toxic men grew up without a father, without any male teachers since education is female dominated in every aspect. They had no positive male role models growing up to teach and guide them. So “toxic masculinity” is actually the ABSENCE of masculinity.
You can watch the movie “the red pill” on YouTube, basically a feminist woman wanted to research the men’s rights movement and after her time doing so she no longer considers herself a feminist. Hell there was a lesbian feminist who disguised herself as a man to prove men have it easier and all the other talking points. She lasted only 18 months despite her goal being 2 years. Why? She found it depressing and too hard and realized how bad men have it and she was actually GRATEFUL she was a woman. She did just recently go to Sweden to go through assisted suicide, I don’t think what she suffered and dealt with ever left her.
So in summary. Lack of fathers (caused by a welfare state) leads to crime, poverty, low education and the cycle perpetuates because those kids will grow up and abandon their children.
And if you come back with a certain statement I’m sure you’re going to use, I got an image and reaction ready for it, because said excuse/statement is weak and proves nothing.
Point taken, but would you say that two parents are needed and gender doesn’t matter? What matters is that one parent is not overburdened with keeds, job and tasks.
Although there are probably certain things that a mother/woman should relay to girl and a father/man should relay to the boy.
Masculine and feminine roles exist for a reason, yin/yang. Too much father or too much mother 100% affects the formative child brain.
Its like the people that convince themselves being divorced doesn’t matter because dad can still visit on weekends lol. Or grandma raising the kid.
Structure is everything.
Sorry adopted people but adopted vs birth child is also an uphill battle.
Nuclear family is optimal to reducing fatherless behavior.
Gender is a meaninglesss term that was propagated by a pedophile (John money, look him up) who was taught by an even worse degenerate (Alfred kinsey). Kinsey tried to promote that children were sexual beings and everyone was secretly a pervert. He said he got this info from interviews from hundreds of couples. He actually got it from sexual offenders and rapists in prison. And he kept a log of their stories and the abuses they did to children and tried to claim that the children crying or going numb during their assault was them having an “orgasm”.
There is no “gender”. There is sex, you are either male or female, no amount of surgery and hormone therapy(which sterilizes) will change that. And kids need a masculine (father) and feminine (mother) role model in their lives. And as finesse said, nuclear family is the best for stability and prosperity… which is why progs hate it and want it destroyed. Can’t usher in their bullshit against a country with strong family values.
Lmao this is like the pedo equivalent of Plato and Socrates
People gonna be big mad at me for that post lol
So where does that leave homosexuals? Is it an identity crisis? Many of the seem to be positively happy people.
Happy until they don’t have kids . So why are people who can’t have kids telling me how to raise mine?
Because you’re not doing it right.
I’ma messing.
They can/may be able to adopt soon so then will know if they’re up to the task. I think i recently saw a headline of some county allowing for such adoptions.
Oh interesting, can you reference for me to use as a source I can’t find a good site
Edit: nvm found one but now I’m disgusted
Size matters 😜
Interesting, so I did look him up and uhhhhh…
Sexologist John Money is often regarded as the first to introduce a terminological distinction between biological sex and “gender role” (which, as originally defined, includes the concepts of both gender role and what would later become known as gender identity) in 1955[8][9] although Madison Bentley had already in 1945 defined gender as the “socialized obverse of sex”,[10][11] and Simone de Beauvoir’s 1949 book The Second Sex has been interpreted as the beginning of the distinction between sex and gender in feminist theory.
So no, he isn’t the first one to “invent gender”, simply he invented the word “gender”.
Also:
The social sciences have a branch devoted to gender studies. Other sciences, such as sexology and neuroscience, are also interested in the subject. The social sciences sometimes approach gender as a social construct, and gender studies particularly do, while research in the natural sciences investigates whether biological differences in females and males influence the development of gender in humans; both inform the debate about how far biological differences influence the formation of gender identity and gendered behavior. In some English literature, there is also a trichotomy between biological sex, psychological gender, and social gender role. This framework first appeared in a feminist paper on transsexualism in 1978.
So due to research happening since the early past century, seems like science is finding out that it’s not just two sexes and that’s it. There is a lot more going on then one might think.
Source? Never seen a massive leftist protest that outright says they hate on the nuclear family. Seems like hasty generalization to me, I thought you were against such things?