I never actually made an accusation so I don’t have to prove shit. In fact I actually even stated I wasn’t even sure whether or not it still worked and shit. What I did say was there is a cheat that existed and I provided the evidence for that claims. What you said was there was no way it could work or it would be immediately detected upon launching the game client.
Fireteam instantly seeing/spotting. glitch/bug/exploit?
Yeah I just tested that one you posted, and that’s exactly what happened.
Test it yourself.
I did admit it would work in the beta trial though
So you have cheat software ready to go to launch this shit? Why don’t you post evidence then? You told me I had to post for claims I didn’t even make. And how exactly does testing one cheat that may not have been usable in public matches to begin with which we have no confirmation of somehow prove that no cheats can work? And I never even said it still works or not either.
You’re really bending over backwards to refuse to acknowledge cheating and hacking is even possible. Something of which anyone who has ever played in an online gaming environment can confirm.
I’m a software developer (well employed to work for a rather insanely large conglomerate as one), I don’t have cheat software (doesn’t really exist).
What you call cheat software are basic debugging and program analysis tools.
Most of the best ones are actually open license
Then you’re either lying about being a software developer or your particular field of software development has nothing to do with gaming. Because the fact you believe there is no way to bypass anti cheat software is patently ludicrous and I could go and find tons of shit out there from other software developers that will say that this is not possible to absolutely prevent because of the inherent nature of programming. I am fairly ignorant of its intricacies myself but I have seen a tiny bit enough of programming coding to be able to know that, on top of this being something that has been combatted for some decades now and has yet to be able to fully prevent this anywhere, a fool proof solution isn’t possible.
Now maybe I am about to make myself look like an idiot on this tid bit but wouldn’t cheating software be literally any program, however small, that you could insert into another program to allow for cheating including whatever mediums you have to funnel them through for certain cheats into the game and such? Pretty sure it doesn’t have to be a triple A title game to be considered software so
If that is the case then did you just deny any cheating programs exist anywhere?
If you want to call out a hack, I want proof.
There’s many things in this (extremely buggy game), that people have called hacks and turned out to be just shitty bugs.
If there’s a bug, show it (can it be reproduced or can you provide video of it or have multiple people reported it).
If there’s a hack, show it (can you provide video of it or have multiple people reported it)
Anecdotal evidence means zero.
That’s not obviously suggesting it is impossible ._.
Once again you keep deflecting because I never made any statement on whether this cheat works or not or any specific cheats for that matter. The main crux now is that you are patently denying it is possible for a cheat to work full stop and like it is inconceivable that any cheats could work.
I didn’t say the anticheat (which is actually the trademarked name of software used for this game), couldn’t be bypassed.
What I said was :
So that hack that you linked to, would be detected by anticheat (trademark). Which I then tested and it was…
Incorrect.
what I said was:
And where is your evidence of the claim that it was detected then? Because you are demanding proof of a claim I didn’t even make about this specific hack beyond that it existed and nothing more. So put your money where your mouth is.
So very often on these forums people cry hack.
And even more so on in-game coms.
If you want to make a claim about a hack being used (instead of you just being soundly beaten by a better Pred/FT), then you need to supply some evidence. It’s that simple.
I never made a claim someone was hacking. All I said was I suspected some individuals I had seen were hacking and cited a hack that I had seen being exposed previously. I never said anything about any specific individuals hacking or even using this specific hack.
What the actual fuck?
Saying you suspect some individuals are hacking… is making a claim they are hacking…
Is your real name Donald Trump?
Really? Because you can suspect someone of anything but that doesn’t mean you are actively making an accusation. Only that you feel like something shady is going on and you could well be wrong or right. I don’t have to prove why I was suspicious, I only have to prove if I claim they were for sure hacking and there is no suspicion. If I follow your logic then that would mean if I was a cop and I suspected someone of a crime that you would believe I was obligated to provide evidence to prove they committed a crime? That sounds a lot more Trumpian to me lol
That’s like demanding I prove a hypothesis when it is just a fucking hypothesis before it can be a hypothesis you fucking retard.
as soon as you voice your suspicions it is then an accusation.
If I say I suspect your are a pedophile to you or someone else, then I am no longer suspecting. I am passively aggressively accusing.
1 Like
No. That is still just a suspicion which is basically just a fucking opinion idiot lol