Nuclear Bombings, would only be necessary if:
- we would need to eradicate a virulent plague to which we have no known cure for. This solution would prevent the spread however a 2000 year mandate of underground dwellings would have to be implemented with possible contamination. A whole civilization bent on preserving itself underground would have to exist and all means to make Personal Protective Wear would have to be immediately manufactured at all costs. The existing culture of humans would have to live underground, and build underground at all cost. This includes tunneling and moving all technology and people into underground dwellings. I potential of new sciences of underground networks would have to be understood.
2.systematically destroy hurricanes which would possibly be the new normal for the next 100 years if global warming were to exist. But we would have no idea what global warming would be like in the next 20 years since evolution still hasn’t indicated any new geological formations that would allow for it to cool. Rather would we wait to see if the heat in the world be an existential evolutionary trait? This would make us inclined to be the hypothetical type 1 civilization where we control the weather of our sphere.
Which would you prefer?
- Nuclear Holocaust to prevent a plague
- or Nuclear holocaust to control the earth?
0 voters