Into the Spiderverse is about

#1

PIxar Studio Girls in cosplay pretending to be boys who pretend their spiderman. cringe. Not a single bit of masculinety in any character. no leads. no heroes. just jokers.
45 minutes in and I’m already regretting starting to watch it. Its a parody on the whole IP targetted to casual viewing to where nobody will really care about.

And they aren’t empowering teenagers AT ALL! They are mocking them because they need parental supervision because not only do the teens don’t have money or job opportunities, but their parents are broke as fuck…
Bunch of nonsense this movie is.

#2

Oh man I can’t wait to take internet forum troll’s opinion seriously

2 Likes
#3

buyer beware.

#4

What?

#5

Into the spiderverse was produced by sony and columbia pictures, not Pixar(Disney)

The only remote thing that would associate it with disney is Disney’s ownership of marvel entertainment.

I sadly could not enjoy the movie because the visual photography gave me a headache. Looked to me as painful as watching stop motion animation. (The reason why I also won’t be watching the new TMNT movie)

1 Like
#6

Its very attention deficit disorder . animation is fun. But the subject matter is too much for this. They basically throw spidermans history out the window and make it a joke in order to fuel several actors careers into superhero universe speculation as there can’t be any more unless its more of this farce.

I mean in all seriousness we never really bought any comics so why are we introduced to this so passively? Is it to promote Mile Morales to over take all other mythos?
At least playstations Spiderman has a take on the universe that grounds people into a new mythos that people can relate to. I think Into the Spiderverse happened too quickly. I mean i would have seen it doing well in about 5-6 years from this day before they should have released the first one. But you know. $$$$

#7

It is…
Meff!
image

2 Likes
#8

speak for yourself bro

Reality is superhero movies (specially animated) are released by the dozens on a single year, but they rarely feature a theatrical release and overall mainstream attention.

I actually enjoy most of them, specially the ones from DC since they are usually gritty, violent and gory. Marvel animated movies are mostly “bleh”

I also read a lot of comics, and the spider-verse concept is almost 10 years old.

You’d be surprised the amount of characters now brought into the movies that are not even 20 years old.

Also, Spiderman is the highest grossing superhero IP. From movies, comics, toys and merchandising. Even more than Batman, Superman and the whole Avengers… COMBINED!

#9

I personally read lots of the 70-80s Spidermans through MArvel Tales and Marvel Teams Ups. My main game was Todd’s Spiderman 1-10 or so and a few dozen he produced prior to that in Amazing Spiderman. I often found the newer version just made them graffiti. Marvel tried to spit them out too much and too fast. I adored SpiderHam because they came with alot of the re-prints in Marvel Tales. So yeah, I’m pretty versed in Spiderman. Just not in the newer version with the Cloned guy and I did actually own 2099 Spiderman but ultimately it didn’t catch on with me. So thats me perspective on why i think they did this movie kind of baked and stoned.

I guess all i can say is that they have a health MCU with this one included except I really think if this is the most intense they feel about the new versions of spiderman, I realized I wasn’t wrong in not enjoying the modern takes.

#10

MEEEEFFFFFFFF

2 Likes
#11

IMG_6563

2 Likes