Which I provided, while you provided only your opinion. That joke is on you kiddo.
New science thread
Well. NextâŚ
Done already. West jelaousy of Russian unity and prosperity.
Youâve provided no evidence for your opinion.
I provided 100% factual concrete evidence, while you provided no evidence for your opinion.
Right. Iâll do my own research
You are unable to do your own research as you even proven by the propaganda counterfeit articles you brainwash yourself everytime. For months you are unable to do it, as you are still unable now, despite believing you are.
I still have to try. Youâre not a good source of information.
The Burden of Iâm right by @LukeSkywalker
Iâm right
QED
The burden is FACTS and EVIDENCES, not ââI am right because I am rightââ, but because I provided evidences that debunked your propaganda news outletes that you are sucking for months. Very likely years. I donât speak in behalf of me, but independent media.
It was a joke (a lame one, but whatever), as is your evidence
On the contrary, my evidence is no joke, but I understand why you are joking, because you know deep inside that you are wrong, irrelevant and in denial.
Iâm making things simpler for you im hopes that you can understand
Simpler to yourself*, since reality is complicated for you.
Perfect description of Meduza and Al Jazeera.
AND YOU
Seems to me like youâre the one who started insulting first, therefore I reckon youâre the one coping.
IQ of a room temperature comment right there.
I would say that from a small consensus, Meduzza was a credible news agency, but at the start of the war has been putting out a kot of Russophobic news. Those news however are more in a social setting as opposed to the political one. Their criticism of the Russian Presidential election however does seem grounded on science and is corroborated by three other independent news agencies as well as taking into account how Kremin has operated in such situations over thr years.