So since we are severely depleting the subject matter to discuss on this forum, here is one I thought makes perfect sense and strangely should be debated and effectionately talked about.
Predators 2010 proposed that Badbloods (Super Predators) can be outliers of the yautja lore but it doesn’t detail the reasons why they exist. It just purely makes them out to be the “Texas Chainsaw Massacre” version of yautja. That is, the yautja clan that have questionable tactics.
This is evident primarily because it is assumed their selection are wildly different from the norm. The inclusion of a sadistic doctor is probably the most obvious apart from the rest as there literally is no valid reason for him to exist in the film.
A selection process often requires for Yautja to actually witness events in such things as actual warzones (streets, countries in conflict), or even facilities where there could be violent uprisings like a penitentiary. This explains about half of the “chosen” crew of prey. What is not explained is why “this nobody” working at a hospital that has intimate interactions with innocent patients might be selected. The Yautja having “god-like intuition” in selection of prey is just implausible. Unless “said nobody” was studied as a incubent who understood tropical and dangerous plants, kidnapped and held to study all sorts of alien plants–which might make good narrative.
I found the movie effective and interesting but its that 70s guy that really is the REAL problem and I just don’t buy it!
I accept even the wierder shit in the movie because it works, such as:
- the new tools that these super preds have
- the captured predator derived from the tribal elkage of the first /second film
- the super predator and the River Ghost are cool ideas in general
- the cast of characters being taken to another planet on a hunting grounds
- weird artifacts that aren’t explain such as the structures of other sacrificial slaughter den
- Nolan as being some weirdo who out-smarted everyone.
I just don’t buy that 70s guy. Is he a joke? Like flipping the script on us. Was it some kind of directors cut joke? The only positive take away is that the narrative from Royce even points directly to Edwin as a point of interest.
There is a definite back story with the original captured Predator because otherwise, the traps we saw only points back to the predator Dutch had faced-off with. That being said, there is much to be told about this predator and why he exists.
As i recall the comic sequel failed to explain anything pre-dating the film and acted more as a shoddy illustrated sequel.

