This game isn’t worth setting it down to 1080p. It was made for PS4 Pro. Not regular…and 1080? If thats the best resolution you got going for your videocard its time to upgrade. That resolution was like 2005ish.
The PC settings don’t have great graphics tweaking but as long as post processing is kept LOW, and shadows kept MED, and textures kept LOW, antialiasing is a joke so keep it MED, Special Effects should be MED or HIGH. YOu should be good to go at 4K,
o h and NO SYNC framerates,
You do realise that if people try to run this game on 4k the game will actually be a slideshow? If ofc they dont run a 2080ti or a RTX TITAN… literally even this card runs the game barley on 60 fps at cinematic on 1080P… now picture that… optimizations is nowhere to be found for PC… and they keep maining PS4 optimizations…
betwen 30 and 60fps is neglregible.
Dude its not it really is not… So many more demanding games that look beautiful af run at 4k 60 fps on MAX settings without tweaks… like please tell me you realise this xD… like please dont defend them seriously…
um…60fps is like icing on a cake that is well at least it keeps things running without choppiness.
Dude… you are missing the point… predator should run above 60 fps on 4K… like around 100 fps on 4k… and on 1080p it should run it like 150 fps…
If we are talking about 1080tis, 2080ti’s and so on… I bet RTX TITAN will run 2-5 fps better than 2080ti… but that card costs 2000$ and it should give you actually 200 fps
Fair but in my opinion the game is not worth running with any settings lower than high. Except for AA, I agree. At most higher resolutions AA is not really needed. I also turn off motion blurr, but to each his own!
Also for clarification, I define, 4k as 3840x2560. 2560x1440 is HD but not 4k. It is more like 1.7k.
That is what both my screens are set to: 3840x2560@60hz. I can say that I can see and feel the difference between 30 and 60 when just on the windows desktop, and even much more so in games.
So again, to each his own!
My 4k is 4090x2160…my gameplay FPS is still solid. Also keep in mind that you’ll need a decend CPU like Intel i5 7500 forgot to mention that. IMHO a good CPU helps tremendously.
I run i7-8700k, but I don’t think that performance specifically was the purpose of the OP.
More so that the resolution is locked to desktop, so if you do not have hardware able to run the game at that resolution it is inconvenient.
I.e. he is unable to get to a reasonable resolution for his set up due to the locking.
I run 9900k… i see no actual fps difference… still runs like sht and drops to 50s on all medium at 1080p
He is explaining that certain Displaymode settings give different effects.
He is just explaining that only one of them locks your screen to whatever size its max is. Changing it to the other one resolves the problem. You can configure it anyway you like. Ive tried. Looks like dirt at any other resolution other than the max IMHO, but the fps is georgeous at lowered settings.
CPU is good for calculating stuff…your issue sounds like it is probably onboard Vram.
No shit xD… i run 1070 which so far ran all games on above 100 fps on max… even those un optimized games or early access i run max 1080p at 88-107 fps…
And in this game this is just a disaster for mid to high end cards
Ma’ man Coffee2Go here explained what the problem is. Kiddo, if you do not know anything about PC gaming, just don’t say anything to avoid looking like an idiot.
The whole purpose of reporting this bug is precisely that. The game is not optimized. Is unplayable on 4K. And barely on 1080P
Thank you! someone fucking gets it… no offense @MassImpact124 i have nth againts you lmfao… but trying to make you see that most hardware hell even 1050ti can run doom eternal on max above 60 fps… xD…
btw I have a 1070 Ti on one PC and a 1660 Super on the other. Not top notch, but all my AAA games run buttery smooth. No, is not time to upgrade. There is a bug in the graphics rendering of this game. Hardware upgrade is not the solution. Optimization is. And the fact that the in-game resolution is not working clearly points that out.
and RTX TITAN that runs actually 150+ fps on 4k… on most games… dude… i want someone to make benchmark and to see… literally it would barley be getting above 60 fps on cinematic
BTW I tested and monitored with RiVa Tuner. CPU usage on this game is not demanding at all. Hell, you can play this game even on an older i3. CPU usage will barely hit above 60% on all cores/threads.
The problem is GPU usage which is being maxed out at 99%. Even if I overclock the GPU VRAM (which is what really improves framerate) it still goes down below 30 on some areas like the shore in Backwater. And that’s on 1080P. On 4K this game is unplayable. PERIOD. Is not up for discussion. I’ve talked to some other PC players and we all experience the same thing.
Unless there is some kind of voodoo magic running on your system or you are just lying about it.
Yep i agree its just not discussable… its just that the game is not made for actual PC GPUs… they priorities PS4 and not PC like wtf…
First of all they didnt even balance out CPU usage to take some of the lifting for the GPU called CPU COLLING which now most new games have… early access…
Umm in general im unable to play this game at all on my 240hz monitor… i wont accept its stuttering cause it looks so bad 60 fps on 240hz at medium… and on low it barley gives me 100… its avg 77 fps on low… and drops to 55… like oof
It’s ironic that the official “minimum” GPU for this game (GTX 960) is unable to play it at stable 30 FPS @ 1080P under low settings and the “recommended” GPU (GTX 1660) cannot run this game on Epic settings.
