That makes sense?.

#1

Two things I can’t understand in PHG.

1st: Why do we have so many FT Soldier Personalization options, if we only have 1 Camera option and we can’t even see our Soldier as we see the Predator in 360 ° ?.

2nd: In the Weapons Options we have the Primary, the Secondary and the Knives for Melee Attack, right ?.
My question is this: Has anyone seen a Soldier take 2 Rifles, or a Rifle and Shotgun ?.
This gets in the way of Movement !. Is taking out the Realism of the Game. How can a Soldier carry 2 Heavy Weapons at the same time?
2.1: Pistols. Pistols are Standard Weapons for any Soldier. No more Large Gun Ammo? Use the Pistol !.
The Pistols should not enter the Secondary Weapons section.
2.2: The Minigun Weapon. How can this Weapon be a Secondary Weapon!?. She is Huge !. The movement as She is Super Limited. But her firepower is very high !. But technically speaking, a Soldier would not be able to take a Minigun and a Rifle together !.

Solutions:

1st: We need a New Camera for the FT just like the Predator Camera.

2nd: A New Way to Select Weapons needs to be done.
1 Weapon - Submachine gun; Assault Rifle; Machine gun; Sniper Rifle;
Grenade launcher; Minigun or Shotgun;
2 Pistol
3 Knife or Weapon for Hand-to-Hand Combat.
Even to Avoid Everyone Use the Same Weapons.

1 Like
#2

Frankly the primary and secondary slots should be arbitrary. Its just a game, no need to lock any weapon to a slot. but I get that some weapons will ultimately be used too exclusively if both were armed because they didnt want high powered weapons to be overused becuase then that would make ammo crates and drops to be not too useful.

2 Likes
#3

The reason FT has the camera angle it does is to be more submersive to give you a feeling of actually being your character. The predator has a 3rd person view due to you need to have more visibility and view more of your surroundings. Hence the different camera angles. If they had 3rd person on the FT’s Predator would stand no chance because they can not catch you by surprise at all. You could see them behind you or the laser from the burner on your back. This would only favor FT more than it already is.

I believe how you select the weapons are fine as they are. But, I do believe minigun should be a primary not a secondary as well as the shotguns.

Knife I think is fine as is, but that’s just my opinion.

2 Likes
#4

This guy is wondering why this doesn’t make sense in a game where there is an alien that can cloak, shoot plasma, and heal in 5 seconds lmaooooo…

3 Likes
#5

How can I jump off the roof of a tall building and still run like nothing happened? How can I take so many bullets from AI and shoot myself with magical syringe and keep fighting? Hmmmmm…maybe because video games are not supposed to be simulators of real life physics.

1 Like
#6

Don’t forget with Amphibious you can literally run super fast on water and mud automatically covers you…yup, such realism is being ruined by the soldiers being able to carry two heavy weapons.

Please tell us you’re trolling…🙄

1 Like
#7

The fall damage, or lack thereof, actually bothers me more than anything other unrealistic quality of this game.

2 Likes
#8

Imagine if video games were meant to be realistic…first bullet to the leg “go on without me, this is too painful just kill me and tell my kids I love them” lol 😆 😂 😅 🤣

2 Likes
#9

Yes, I’ve also seen the Virgen Mary in a tortilla once.

#10

Yeah. “Realism” only needs to be enough to avoid the feeling of magical physics. As long as there is that minimum, balance and engaging gameplay is much more important.

#11

Yes and no…just like in the movies, shit doesn’t have to make sense. That’s why there’s the saying “it’s just a movie”.

We play video games because of the magical element. That’s how we escape the reality of life.

We admire super heroes because deep down we wish we could do the things they do.

Whoever thinks vídeo games are supposed to be realistic is mentally ill.

#12

Damn dude you using that suit they had in Ready Player One? Cuz that’d be accurate

#13

I’m lost???

#14

It was a joke…I guess it wasn’t as funny as I thought

#15

Im sure if I understood it i would have thought it was funny, but I didn’t get it…my bad 😕

#16

Some games are meant to be magical.

In the context of a games like PHG, CoD, Battlefield, etc… there are expectations such as limited ammo, limited number of different weapons carried at one time, limited gear, limits on jump height and sprint speed, etc.

That’s where perks/specializations can’t be too crazy either. Amphibious and field medic are definitely on the magical side of “realism,” but they can be fun if balanced correctly.

2 Likes
#17

You want realism okay then. Every weapon in the preds arsenal would kill everyone in one hit. The FT would be even slower due to traversing jungles, and rivers, the FT cannot set off any alarm or the AI would absolutely dominate them. Need I go on?

2 Likes
#18

Yes please…😆

#19

Too many bad post make Prediatrd brain hurt Preditard

2 Likes
#20

That’s explainable in lore though. Yautja muscle and cartilage I belive are significantly more shock absorbing than ours, which is because they spent millions of year presumably living and moving through trees.

Their bones are much more durable than ours as well and I think they heal faster too. I could be wrong about this last one. And their skin is definitely tougher than ours. I can understand why Yautja don’t take fall damage.

1 Like