I still think organizing a strike would be tough. Some people would be happier than others with their situation, some would be on the fence, some would be displeased. You need central authority and rules to govern these situations. Perhaps not a union as we know it, but it can’t be everyone for themselves either.
Are Americans not allowed to innovate?
Or, if you ain’t one of the working boys you don’t get to negotiate or be part of the group. You either put your nose to the grindstone with the rest of us and negotiate together or fuck off like the leech every rep is.
Think about what you said for a moment. “Central authority…”. That’s where the problems always begin. A group of fuck-sticks making “rules for thee, but not for me” that only truly benefit themselves at the expense of others, while not doing any of the real work. Individual achievement and hard work ethics are the real way to get out of bad economic situations. Depending on others to do things for you is never the best option, outside of having a doctor treat your illness or a lawyer represent you in court (assuming you know nothing about legal proceedings). Accomplish your own shit, is what I say. And I’ll take that to my grave.
1 Like
You can innovate long as you start an llc and realize if it hurts the energy sector youll end up dead…
1 Like
I wouldn’t call them domesticated, per se, because the moment they get challenged, they turn into screeching harpies that’ll claw you to shreds without the slightest hesitation. None of them are above ruining anyone’s life in any way they can, if it’s keeps their bubble from popping. That’s what socialists do.
1 Like
Is that Ted Kennedy? If so, it’s a good quote from an absolute pile of garbage excuse for a human. But a broken clock is right twice a day…
It can be a problem, but without central agencies, like the government, we’d all be earning slave wages
when all the university’s relate to Jesuit societies of old u know when u know
1 Like
Any government is a necessary evil at its smallest and most manageable, I concede. However, it’s current state is one of the worst in history. Remember that it was the government of the time under king George that instituted slavery as law innthe colonies. It was the government that kept slavery in the early United States (the vast majority of people couldn’t afford a slave). It was the Confederate government that fought a war to keep slaves. It was the government that enacted the policies that nearly killed off all the native tribes and it was the government that created the economic issues that began in the 60s with the welfare state that still plague us today under the guise of “this is for your own good”.
Individuals innovating is what truly made this nation the greatest in the shortest amount of time. Improvements can always be made, of course. It’s a marathon, not a race, but depending on people who don’t give a rats ass about you is never the best choice.
1 Like
All I’m saying is to get something done on a grand scale you need to be organized and not loose individuals. Strikes and protests take cohesion and not individually brokered contracts. Big business has so much power now and you want to take on it one on one. They’ll welcome that
I did specify an organization, just a loose one. Not a bloated, overly bureaucratic one.
1 Like
The only way to know if it’ll work is to put it into practice. I remain skeptical tho
He just targeted the wrong people. Should have mailed his gifts to career politicians instead.
Granted I also think a certain day that happened in January of last year didn’t go far enough and that many if not almost all of those politicians should have had their heads and bodies have a divorce.
Oh, it’s THAT Ted.
Yeeeaaahhhhhh… no.
Let me just get this out there so it’s clear. I am hyper opposed to resorting to violence unless it’s absolutely necessary vis-a-vis a case of self defense.
Mr K. up there is/was (cuz I can’t remember if he’s extant) a monster who killed innocent people doi g a shitty job. Granted, it’s a department that has no business existing etc. but that’s no excuse for his actions. He deserves what he gets/got.
He can rot in H. E. Double 🏒 's.
Now that begs the question. Are you against violence because you’re incapable of it?
Does Timothy Mcveigh count?
Whats worse? Allowing evil to grow and only fighting back when it initiates conflict or to initiate violence against it before it gets to the point of conflict?
Being against violence only works if violence never comes your way and trust me… violence will catch up.
Couldn’t tell you, to be honest. I signed up to serve in the army and chose Tank Commander as my occupation, but was rejected for medical imperfections beyond the acceptable limit. I carry a you-know-what regularly because I have to work in nasty areas sometimes but have only been tested in minor ways in my opinion. I was able to diffuse the situations. But I also know my own personality well, and I know that we’re I to be backed into a corner, forced to melee, it wouldn’t stop til myself or my attacker were dead or completely incapacitated. I have that kind of a temper, where it’s a short fuse, but hard to light. I k ow most things are stupid and not worth fighting/dying over.