With Hunter having 1250 health, and 7.5% passive armor. He is just wayyyy better than both of these classes. Here’s why. You put on impen and you now have 27.5% armor. Or in other words, 27.5% more health. Putting you over what berserker has at base health. BUT LLAMA WHAT IF YOU PUT IMPEN ON ZERK?? Excellent question. Berserker has this really lame passive where he regains stamina very slow. Add that with his already low stamina pool, and well. Long story short you need adrenal boost to play berserker and not feel AWFUL. But zerks low perk points don’t allow him to run both of these.
So when you run berserker, you’re actively choosing to either be tank but completely immobile(which is very very bad) or run adrenal boost to have an actual playable stamina pool, but then not even be as tanky as hunter… Hunter just outclasses berserker as a tank… that doesn’t really seem right. And hunter does not feel op so the answer is not to nerf hunter but to buff berserker. He needs 1 more perk point, and possibly even more stamina and the removal of his stamina regeneration debuff.
City hunter might sound a little crazy, saying he needs a buff. As when he dropped he was widely accepted as the strongest class. But he’s fallen from grace. I’m not saying he’s bad, but he’s definitely redundant. No class should just straight up be better than another. They should offer different playstyles and such. But hunter is just Straight up better than city hunter. City hunter does not share Hunters passive armor. So he just dies faster straight up. Then on top of that he had less perk points. So for the small price of dying faster and having less perk points, you get… a wrist launcher… Terrible. TERRIBLE value there. My suggested buff would be to increase city hunters speed to scouts, and give him the same number of perk points as Hunter. If you Just make him faster, he’s still not as good as hunter and Scout would just be a better version of city hunter still, as scout also has the 7.5 passive armor and adding that with impen would actually make him tankier than city hunter and would have more stamina. So city hunter at his current state is not at a very good spot. There’s buffs you could give him , and he’d still be weaker than scout and hunter.
So please @Courier @OldKingHamlet… please pass on the message that these two classes are just statistically worse than the base hunter and completely outperformed. To that end Samurai could also lose the stamina debuff and Viking could use a lot of help, but also I could care less about those nonsense classes so please just focus on the 2 I’ve listed above