You are
Do you like Crusades? Do you like Giant mechs?!
I’m not saying you are I’m saying the scientist 🙄 also really you can’t look up the information yourself? Lol want me to hold your hand while you go to the bathroom and feed you your cereal to lol
THE SCIENTISTS DON’T CALL EVOLUTION FACT EITHER XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
At least, not the ones who shouldn’t be fired.
It is legit not on the internet you fucking dipshit, besides how hard is it to post a hyperlink (that is, if you aren’t pulling this outta your arse)? Save us both some time lmao
Look who’s talking 🙄
What is this in relation to? Seriously, if you’re gonna argue with someone at least be direct about what you’re complaining about.
Also you still haven’t provided any reference for the disproval of evolution, and if you took science in any capacity in university (or high school for that matter) you would know that providing references serves a purpose. I’m not asking you to provide a fucking bibliography, but if you’re gonna cite some information that isn’t reguarded as general knowledge then you’d better provide access to it lol
Genuinely there is no reference to the disproval of evolution anywhere in the first 3 pages of Google search other than websites that are obviously posted by the Church or the fucking Guardian newspaper when I type in ‘disproval of evolution’. If you have in fact read in a genuine scientific journal article (once more, if you took science in any capacity in university you’ll know what this means and will likely still be able to access it) that evolution as a theory has been conclusively disproved, then by all means show me and I’ll accept I’m wrong and move on with my fucking life.
Here, I’ll even give you an example of what I expect. It’s not a journal article, but it’s a website from an actual university and not some localised catholic cult of dipshits, or a goddamn tabloid newspaper. Ftr this is one of the first things that came up when I searched for ‘disproval of evolution’:
Well I’m sorry you don’t know how to use search engines to find articles for yourself to prove my point 🙄 thought you were a grown adult lol 😂
But my point is there are already articles out there and I don’t need to show you because you can look it up yourself, so stop living in the past and using your childhood education to dictate your life’s decisions lol 😂
Ya and what happens when I find an article that shares the same conclusions but not the same arguments that you agree with?
You going to take the L of not presenting yourself?
Or are you going to cry about slander?
Burden of proof is on the individual who brings the argument up. It doesnt matter what I look up if it’s not what you agree with.
1 Like
Ah no worries, I’m sorry you lied about attending university and that you obviously either made up the ‘disproval of evolution’, or are too brain-dead to know what a hyperlink is or how to use it. You could tell a university professor that you don’t need to include references cos it’s on the internet for the guy to find himself, you’d still fail the fucking assignment XD
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
Stop making shit up if you have no way or intention to prove it.
Because I can’t find any reliable reference to this on the internet, and because you haven’t provided reference of any kind, imma assume that you’re bullshitting.
Also you’ve never been to university evidently, and you have the nerve to talk to me about ‘childhood education’ lmfao
Found it
Turns out he’s both too stupid to figure out a hyperlink and too stupid to think
1 Like
You can sort of say no one agrees and it’s what you believe that is truth and that’s not a source I would use lol but your if evolution is true lol your Neanderthal is showing lol 😂🤣
Again you argument is invalid even if it’s longer and just to insult me, if evolution was true, you would definitely be proof of it lol especially by your maturity you Neanderthal lol 😂 🤣
Okay
I believe your a ferret and I’m going to do levitation tricks on you while calling myself mad eye moodie
Oh wait your not a ferret because that’s not factually true
Now cut the pretentious philosophy crap
Oh my God
It’s almost Like I called this very thing
It’s almost like your refusal to site your sources makes it impossible to have an actual conversation with you at your own fault
XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
1 Like
Well, really then, that just proves that you have less fucking knowledge about how evolution works than @Eshtion lmfao
Btw you still haven’t given any semblance of reference to this apparently game-changing ‘disproval of evolution’ you want us all to just know about magically.
Seriously, I would consider getting something of an education before you even begin to attempt to argue with a postgraduate about evolution and how it works. Check out the website I put on here to demonstrate to you how to share your information on evolution’s disproval, you could prolly learn a thing or two from it.
It’s not even remotely philosophical lol
It’s just ret@rded XD
1 Like
Well using sources are hard when you have both opinions opposite of each other so even I did reference them you wouldn’t agree otherwise, thus this thread continues 🤷♂️
Like I told him you can’t site references if you don’t already disagree
WHAT THE FUCK XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
I would reccomend learning what the fuck citing is, because that statement is complete bullshit. Seriously, google it.
Citing something is just providing reference to where you have found information or ideas that are from other people. It has nothing to do with orientation of opinions, you fucking dipshit lmao
Provide a fucking hyperlink to your reliable source disproving the theory of evolution, I’ll admit that I’m wrong, and we can fucking move on with our lives. Alternatively, just admit that you are talking outta your arse, and once again, we can move on with our lives.
1 Like
Just because you think someone will disagree with you is no reason for neglecting to provide evidence for your point of view, you dumbass. In fact, if that were the case, no scientific theories at all would ever have emerged. Ever. Then again, I don’t expect somebody with your intellectual caliber to understand what the fuck ‘the scientific method’ or ‘peer review’ is.
1 Like
“We’d just disagree so there’s no point in it”
continues to argue without a source
Your just hiding behind the lack of sources as a shield