History IS written by the winners

Investigations were performed, hundreds of them. Hell, Trump had a 2 year long investigation into the 2016 election after claiming fraud after winning. They found nothing and had to wrap it up.

You have to provide evidence of your claims, simply making claims isn’t sufficient. The second lawyer is better but he’s going to make emotional appeals rather than arguments.

Trump really scrapped the bottom of the barrel for his lawyer, guy is so out of his depth. The second lawyer is better better spoken but making claims that are directly contradictory and is going to make it emotional rather than legitimate arguments.

Edit - Lol, now he’s saying that it will lead to a second civil war… it’s ridiculous. It’s all a long winded, emotional appeal. Ha, ha, ‘canceled‘, I bet he got payed a bonus for working that in.

I remember seeing the Republicans evidence

Not so much from the Democrats though

I remember seeing a lot of people refute the claims though

Really you saw evidence of the Democrats stole the election, because the justice department didn’t. All the Republican governor’s didn’t. SCOTUS didn’t.

I saw the republican “evidence”

Not the Democratic “evidence” that irrefutably disproves the claims of the Republicans

I would really like to see it though

From my POV republicans said democrats did this and provided their “proof”

Then all I’ve seen from the Democrats is just saying no you lie

There has been no court ruling proving either side is correct

It’s an extremely important debate that was swept under the rug IMO

They treated it as if it was just a stolen sandwich from the break room

Not the highest form of office that can be held by a US citizen

You know the constitution states the chief justice of the Supreme court is to preside over an impeachment trial?

You know who refused to hear the impeachment case and is not presiding over the impeachment trial?

If the courts unwillingness to hear claims of election tampering is proof enough, why isn’t the courts unwillingness to hear the impeachment?

It’s gone. Not even independent media taking about that anymore. World goes on

They are talking about it

Just not in the US

Now in Burma

Where martial law has been declared as a result of perceived election fraud

That’s not surprising for a third world country

Looks pretty modern to me

My bad. I just went with this hotfix

It was the certification of the election on dec. 14. They certified that the election took place according to each states laws. Trump had 50,000 poll watchers, none gave the courts any testimony that would have disqualified that certification.
Trump at the time tried strong arming key republican governors into stopping them from certification, they didn’t find any substantial proof or they would have done so even without his pushing for it.

Trump lost a fair and free election, he failed to prove otherwise.

The courts failed to hear otherwise.

That’s a different matter. Not like it makes a difference

Day 2 let’s go!!

I wonder why they aren’t going after guiliani

He’s the one who incited violence by calling for trial by combat

I think going forward if the president is a democrat the VP MUST be a republican and vice versa

Would the VP benefit from the impeachment then?

No this should be implemented next election

Force these fuckers to work together

Reconcile their differences or get the fuck out

1 Like

That will the the day when pigs fly

They are running the risk of an actual revolution from the people

The shit they been doing for the past 100 years isn’t sustainable

I think once Dems and reps actually work together we’ll find out that government kinda sucks and can’t do much. It’s only when they go against each other and decide to collaborate on a half-assed plan so neither looses ground, do they look like they are doing their best considering the need to show a little respect to the other party.

Day 3 start!!