Ah yeah cause you act in a role as a pedophile, you are one.
Makes sense, ever since i acted as Jesus in a church play I’ve been able to walk on water and turn water to wine. In fact I’m only becoming a doctor to cover up my ability to heal the sick with a single touch.
On the contrary, you are the one comparing this to not be comparable with that logic you are trying to make child porn seem less severe and awful than what it is, so I advise that you should stop.
Context of the scene or script is irrelevant. She was physically kissed. Therefore kissing child and putting tongue in her mouth is pedophilia, pure and simple. Script means nothing. Same shit is implied in child’s porn which is repulsive and sick and degenerate.
If you have physical interraction with child, YES. Since children cannot consent, it depends how pedophile is portrayed, if script tells you to perform something on a child, then yes. If doesn’t, then no.
Your other comparison is completely anecdotal and irrelevant.
A child getting raped on film for pedos to jack off to and Clint Eastwood kissing this girl on screen aren’t even close to similar.
Child porn is the filming of a rape of minor, nothing is implied, those kids are scarred and traumatized and violated, this actress was not, as it was acting and a movie.
You fool, I was using your own line of logic. That’s the logic you’re using , so what you said applies to you.
Repent, my child and accept forgiveness for thy sins.
God bless thy Senate
Yes they are close to similar. Both are physical sexual acts. One is just less severe, either way it’s sexual act.
According to your logic, it is not, since it can be non rape on the script right? That is your logic, they are being told to do what directors tell them to do. According to your logic, they are just doing their job. And it’s also classified as acting according to your logic, since it’s also film industry. Both are physical performances, one is kissing in Hollywood movie which is less severe and script is for ‘‘protection’’, other is far more severe and script is also for ‘‘protection’’. That girl is also scarred and traumatized for being without her consent kissed and violated by Clint Eastwood, it’s only a matter of time before she speaks out.
On the contrary, I was using your own line of logic. So what you in fact said applies to you cancer sore mongrel.
LOL no she fucking ain’t
“I don’t know cos I wasn’t privy to the conversation. He went over to Don Siegal, who was the director, Clint Eastwood did, and Siegal said, “Hey! Why don’t you kiss her, instead of covering her mouth with yr hand?” So basically that scene, the way I looked was actually (real). They printed the first take and that look was definitely (laughs) not a put on! Because I had NO IDEA IN THE WORLD THAT HE WAS GONNA KISS ME. So I was kinda stunned!”
Here’s her quote.
And she probably deep inside is brutally scarred and traumatized and is very likely suing him in the future. Since they humiliated her. It took long time for Epstein’s victims to speak out.
Why don’t you ask her yourself, Pamelyn Ferdin is her name, and she’s perfectly alive.
And she’s spoken about it before, like the quote I just sent, victims don’t do that you dumb bastard cause they’re actually scarred.
Many victims speak very good about their abusers, until abusers lose their power, Epstein for example, they were all speaking amazing about him, so you are very wrong ‘‘dumb bastard’’.
The fact that your comparing Clint Eastwood kissing an actress in a movie, to fucking Jeffery Epstein
I’m actually at a loss for words right now holy shit, you’re actually a shit person for that comparison, you know what, go tell the victims that, how what happened to them is so similar to an actor kissing an actress in a movie, see what they say.
It’s even more closer than the Child porn kiddo
No, you are just pedophile apologist.
That is something that you should do my kid. Since you are defending pedophilia. She is probably scared of him, just like Epstein’s victims, so she is not yet speaking against him.
It’s not, if anything it’s 100x farther away than the cp argument.
You’re so fucking stupid dude.
You’ve crossed an actual line from kind of annoying stupid to why are you allowed on the streets stupid.
It’s 100x closer to the child porn argument. Or you are trying to make Child Porn like something good you pedophile sicko?
Says you
At least now I learned that you and @TheSenate are both pedophiles, now I know how to hold you accountable. I think you are the one that should not be allowed after this argument to walk the streets at all. You need to be interrogated by local authorities my dude.
Fucking try me. You don’t have the balls or the skill to put me in the dirt.
Suicide by cop would be poetic justice for you my boy, only thing I have to do is grab popcorn and watch body cam footage on youtube.
Age of consent is 18, this is ‘‘under criminal code in force’’
