Aim assist is a hack in my book. If games with massive amounts of money like Fortnite can’t do it, you think the devs from this one can? No way man…
Limit angular velocity and acceleration for mouse to controller levels
But when PC players dominate it isn’t an issue. Do you think m/k should be limited to the turn/move speed of a controller? Or is that advantage fine.
It should not be limited, obviously. Its not my fault PS players have an inferior device on with they choose to play. What If I choose to play on PS and use a broken controller and then ask for other people to use broken controllers? This can keep on going with different sound systems, different TVs, people on PS using MK combo, a real MK device on games that actually support it.
Its people choice. If they don’t really like it they can turn off cross play but making my mouse work like a controller? It boggles the mind how ridiculous of a request this is.
A broken controller, really… can we say false equivalency. 😅
Not really, a controller is like a broken mouse for aiming… That said I gave you more examples. Someone could use TV speakers and demand people can’t use headsets sine it gives directional precision and that is not fair! People could plug in mouse and keyboard combo for the PS and use it against people using only controllers, is that fair? I got a MK combo myself for my PS4. I can find more. Bottom line is limiting superior tech because people chose to game on inferior tech makes no damn sense. You implement something to aid the controllers but not broken aim hack. Perhaps a button press that instantly turns the other way.
What’s next? Limiting PC players to below 30 frames because it runs like shit on consoles?
If they choose to make it more fair perhaps they will let you to turn the limiting off, if you turn cross play off so it’s PC only.
Its already fair, if PS players don’t want to play with PC because of advantages they can turn cross play off. No PC player is going to play a game that makes your mouse garbage.
Skeptic said it best, playing game’s with a mouse makes you feel weightless. It isn’t about making it garbage it’s about fairness and aesthetics.
Guys we can stop to argue about that shit. Console need aim assist, better sense options and optimization. That is the only thing they could do. Also we need an update this month. Like, we really need that, the game is dying.
We might get an update tomorrow, if we’re lucky.
I really dislike waiting for an announcement.
Yes. Different rules for crossplay would be perfect. Limited aim velocity/acceleration, all low graphic settings disabled, FOV locked to PS4/5 equivalent, and then crossplay would be unlocked. If you want to play differently, then play against others on the same type of machines.
They might wait until Friday. Last weekday of October.
The might, if they do wait, I’d still like some news even if it’s a list if shaders.
I find it hilarious to see pc players here, who asked for realism for example with the cape, the bullet drop … etc but when it comes to the ability to aim … there they forget the realism why that gives advantage. I am not saying that they have to limit the pc (crossplay only between consoles, those of pc that are left alone with their superiority, we have never needed them), it just seems curious to me.
If they implement anything but the low gfx I will never touch that cross play again. If you think we’re spending twice or more the money of a PS4 for just the gfx card, almost 50% of a PS4 price on a mouse so you can downgrade our experience… All I can say is that you’re out of your mind. You’re going to get PC players to disable cross play or stop playing entirely. Not our fault you decided to play on a toaster. So if you’re that troubled with how unfair it is, instead of asking for nonsense just disable cross play yourself and have a wonderful life.
Can’t wait to see your opinion on PS4 demanding they downgrade the PS5 so its on the same level as PS4. Its mental. Like why does PS5 have more frames then on my PS4? DOWNGRADE!
Right! When discussing whether one or the other controlling is “better”, one also should take into account that “better” is not always better - in terms of game fun or in terms of realism or alike. Very true man!
We should not mix said “angular velocity and acceleration limit” proposal with the “aim assist for PS4” question. Aim assist for PS4 nevertheless would still be desirable or even necessary.
For PHG it might be to late for such a limit - because if pandoras box has been opened, the evil is out…
But one could think about something alike a “crossplay compatibility mode” - which can voluntarily be activated - or alike…
Never once have I said or read anywhere on these forums where somebody suggested that PC players must have a locked frame rate, but I suppose it’s always easier to argue against a strawman.
Oh, now you’re cherry picking since you don’t care unless its about PC players lol. Now if you did not see discussions about frame rate difference between PCs and PS then you did not read enough on the forums. Frame rates are one of the biggest advantages PC players have over consoles. The difference between 30 frames that dip and stable 80s and 90s is HUGE.
This might be true for the pure “eye-hand coordination skill”, but there are other skills, alike tactical or strategical skills. It might shift the predominant skills, yes. But for a game alike PHG, which has the depth for using said other skills, this might even be an improvement not to be underestimated.
Some truth in it; at least it should not be possible to increase the frame rate by lowering foliage details or alike - if you ask me…
And it is also true, that there is a visual advantage for PC players. But, if you ask me, if you limit the angular speed/acceleration, a little bit of said advantage automatically is removed too.
This is because one of the advantages of PC players is that they can look around faster (while still seeing the cloaked pred in distances) - if they could not look around as fast as they can yet (due to speed and acceleration limit), the advantage of a better frame rate automatically will be decreased a little too, right?