It’s not like humanity has not made bad decisions in the past. Look at the invention of nuclear weapons. Any all conflict has potential to turn into world ending scenario.
New science thread
I mentioned nuclear weapons yesterday first. So I think you need to take a look at actually what I said if you are able to understand and that includes looking up nuclear weapons invention, since it was regulated LOL. You are literally mentioning thing that has been regulated. Therefore regulating nuclear weapons is not bad decision, now as for making it, it’s subjective. Same thing will be with AI, if it goes too far, it will be regulated just like nukes (which I mentioned yesterday before you replied with cryptic argumentative anecdotal nonsense). You can’t even read or grasp or comprehend basic sentences that I in fact even mentioned yesterday. It’s very unlikely that you have even ability to understand yourself.
That is literally you my dude.
Not that well, Iran is close to getting one. North Korea has one. Pakistan got one despite regulations. Now Belarus has one. I would not call that good regulation.
Lol. Good one
So? Pakistan has 500 of them, Iran is close getting them and I see no problem with that, so not allowing countries to have them is not equivalent of regulating them. North Korea has 15+ of them, not one. You don’t even know the numbers. So they are still regulated, just because other countries that you dislike having them does not mean they are not regulated. It’s simply that you just don’t like multipolarity. Every country has right to have nuclear bombs, that has nothing to do that bombs are not being regulated. You are misinterpreting regulations with de-nuclearizations which are not same thing. All of those countries have professionals and controls.
Factual one.
Literal one
Literally factual*
I didn’t mean one as literal (like you always do), I meant that those countries have nuclear weapons in general.
Every country has right to have nuclear weapons? So why is Russia so insistent on ukraine or Poland not having them? Or why would USA not want Mexico or Cuba to have them?
No, you mean literal, in reality I don’t take things literally, unless they are important things. Yes they have and that’s in fact good. Since there will be no 1 country to dictate. That’s not not regulating, in fact it is regulating, since either nobody attacks anybody or somebody attacks and everything goes down.
Because it’s a threat to Russia, since it’s hegemonic ambition. It’s counter reaction to reaction. Also Russia doesn’t care about Poland as long as it does not attack Russia. Iran is not threat too, yet USA is insistent of Iran. Same reason why USA would not want Mexico or Cuba to have them is the same reason why Russia would not want Poland and Ukraine have them. Neighboring nations. Iran is not USA’s neighboor.
Regulating as in regulating access or quantity. Every country should not have them. It was a mistake that they were made.
Neither. They decide quantity and access. Only regulation is to not use them unless it’s completely necessary as a last resort. If nukes were not created, then there would be no end of WW 2 if it was mistake making them. But still now they are regulated.
Of course WW2 would end. Eventually Japan would lose.
There is a process of regulation, but there are still leaks and counties that were not intended to have them found a way to acquire anyway. With AI, one such leak could mean danger to humanity. Yes, we are not there yet, but we are heading in the direction of giving AI more capabilities. It is learning so there is a possibility it can become semi conscious and keep secrets from us.
WW 2 would end with far more casualties in that scenario, also it’s not really true that Japan would eventually lose, since they were never willing to give up. They were pretty much wiping and damaging Pearl Harbor already and even dominating Chinese. As for regulation. Process of regulation is there, as for countries that are not intended to have them, that does not exist, since one country that has nuclear bomb has no right to lecture other should it have or not. That is not related with regulation, but domination. Also those countries did not found the way, they were allowed to have them by their own allies. With AI same thing would happen and danger for humanity would always exist. But if it’s regulated, just like nuclear bombs, nothing will happen as long as it’s kept balanced. So we are not there yet, but if AI gets into that direction (I repeated to you same fucking thing and you still are unable to listen outside of your box) it will be regulated like nuclear bombs and every country will keep them under control like nuclear bombs and disable self-awareness. So it cannot become semi-conscious, because we would know their consciousness, that’s the whole point. They cannot keep secrets if they are being monitored 24/7. That’s why Geneva Convention exist for a reason.
You said before that all counties have right to have nuclear weapons and now you say that they are owned by only those that were intended to have them. That doesn’t make sense so it doesn’t matter how many times you say it if it’s not logical.
You can also look to weapons in general. Let take a look at Victor Bout. If there are regulations for weapon sales, then why did he have to go around them?
Pakistan was not intended to have nuclear weapons. But, Khan found way to go around regulations to get them.
You need to learn how to comprehend basic logic and common sense. Yes all countries have right to have nuclear weapons. And no you are the one who said that they are owned by only those that were intended to have them. And used it as ‘‘regulation’’ tactic. And you now literally said that Pakistan was not intended to have nuclear weapons, while it was intended like every country with certain limits. If they were not intended to have it, they would never have it, the fact that they have it means that they were intended. And I am looking weapons in general more than you and your thick stupid skull still cannot grasp and comprehend the basic facts and common sense. If it’s used controllably it’s regulated. Regular weapons can be owned by many other people, so those people are not people in power and therefore they might be potential criminals. While people in power have bigger credibility and standards and control and are under regulations and contracts. Comparing regular weapons being checked and nuclear weapons that are already checked and regulated before country gets it are 2 different things. Again Khan did not go around regulations to get them, but he had gone around decision makers who should to have it and who should not. In fact the ones who said that Pakistan should not have them were the ones who went around them.
You literally are the one who stated it. So what I answered to in fact you which is very logical, but maybe you have 2 braincells, so it’s not logical to you.
I did say that there are countries not intended to have them. My mistake. You said that everyone can have them. My apologies.
So if all counties have right to have them why is it so difficult to get them? It’s because of regulations, right? But after the regulations were in place, Pakistan was still able to get nuclear weapons and Iran will most likely as well.
Correct
According to your previous posts, you implied opposite than what you say now, you imply that it’s difficult to get them, while earlier you mentioned (indirectly implying) completely opposite. Regulations are not the reason why other countries have difficulty to get them. Not being allowed to get it and regulations are 2 separate things. Countries that border Russia, China and USA are not allowed to get them. That is again not related with regulations. Yes Iran will also get the weapons because it is regulated, Pakistan was able to get nuclear weapons, because it was regulated.
I’ll send you the article about Khan when I get home. I have not read it in a long time, but I’m pretty sure that Khan evaded regulations to get nuclear weapons to Pakistan.
As for Iran, the regulations on Uranium enrichment are meant to prevent them from building a nuclear weapon. I seems that if they are able to build one that the regulations did not work.