That guy is right , because you don’t perceive something as “woke” , doesnt mean it isn’t.
Naru kicked the shit out of the other tribesmen, he landed one hit on her before he needed help
Now run along you little scamp , before Tony P sticks his size 8 doc martins on your ass for being so gullible.
because you do perceive something as “woke”, doesnt mean it is.
He was also trying to wrestle her and capture her, not beat her.
But no if it’s a fight, it’s a fight to the death no matter the circumstances
Actually after rewatching the scenes several times with increased highlights and contrast u can see the bullet just shoots the part of his head where the predlocks connect, so it was more of a graze and that shouldn’t have affected his cognitive ability
Neh, I went back to that scene too, it hit the top of his brain, enough to affect. Besides even if it was that’s still dazing him.
Remember when the best hunter , sat upwind from the bear ? 😍 totally awesome
“The movie takes place on the Northern Great Plains, but says that the warriors are Comanche. There Comanche were not a tribe on the Northern Great Plains. The Comanche were in Texas, eastern New Mexico, and the most southern part of Kansas. Tribes of the Northern Great Plains included Assiniboine, Sioux, Crow, Blackfeet, Plains Cree, Ojibwa, Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara. The Northern Great Plains extended from Northern Nebraska to Canada and didn’t include any part of the traditional Comanche territory”
“Near the beginning, the Comanche tribe’s camp is shown, and there is a caption reading “The Northern Great Plains, September 1719.” By the 18th century this was Cheyenne Territory, and the Comanche would have been living in the Southern Great plains”
https://gamerstail.com/prey-is-extremely-historically-accurate/
“One of the white men plays dead and the Predator cannot see him because Naru gave him medicine that lowers his body temperature. Hypothermia sets in when the body’s temperature drops below 95° F (35° C). The body temperature would need to be well below that in order to make him invisible to the Predator. Naru later takes the medicine herself to battle the Predator without it being able to see her. Symptoms of hypothermia include shivering, slurred speech, shallow breathing, a weak pulse, clumsiness or lack of coordination, drowsiness, confusion, and loss of consciousness. She would be in no condition to engage in combat if her body temperature was that low”
Explain away 😄
Uh huh , people that didn’t like it are totally wrong, let’s not forget
"The film is set in 1719 and shows large scale bison slaughter by the fur traders, which makes that scene approximately 150 years too early.
The Métis of Canada had organized hunts for trade as early as the 1770s, however it wasn’t until the mid-19th century, or more accurately, the 1870s that large scale bison eradication occurred by settlers and the military"
Its historically accurate y’all. The amount of shit shoveling to push this movie as the next best thing is ridiculous.
Double ouch 😁 its rated lower on RT and imdb than the original after getting called the highest rated predator movie .
Its a movie. Get over it. It feels like this is more important than the state of world economy. If you don’t like you don’t like it. You don’t have to peruse every dialogue and scene for historical and scientific inaccuracies. See the bigger picture. The movie is a success and will lead to more movies and game for the IP.
Look around, I’m responding to the response I had on my opinion. Nobody had an issue when they were posting , but I post something that you don’t agree with im to “get over it”
Wait until I jump back and see that response anywhere when I said I didn’t like it 👀
I cant find it 🤔
The days of circle jerking over the movie have ended ? I guess 🤨
Fair. I just looked at the last response and it seemed like something I’ve seen quite a few times over the last few days.
Its not a dig directly either , you are cool . Its anybody else that tried to bash anybody saying anything negative with “its highly rated so you must be wrong”
That grinds my gears
The way I see it , if you are going to rate something so highly , then it should be open to criticism. Shutting criticism down is just stupid
Not saying you’re wrong. In fact you are correct. I think we should be happy about the moderate success and stop dragging it down. Most of the criticisms are fair.
The more well done movies the better , but in my eyes if prey is the new standard like they say? I dont see it as worthwhile
Theres just no good answers. I don’t think they messed up cause of lack of research. It was the best/simplest way to make pieces fit.
The whole comanche narrative and pushing it as historically accurate ? If its false then it should be called false . Which it 100% is .
Its pushed by the cast , the crew and everybody who produced it.
They openly say its about diversity. Thats not letting it be a movie , if anything they are hurting it
It seems like the general population accepted the movie as good. And having the faithful bring it down just seems weird. Do we want the IP to succeed? I get going against illfonic. Theyre performance just kept getting worse. But this is the new light for the IP. Criticism is ok, but picking at every instance of a mistake or nonsense is going a bit far.
It’s a fiction. They wanted this setting, the wanted this tribe. So it doesn’t fit very well. It’s not a documentary. Noone is using this for their Jeopardy memory bank. If people get curious about Comanche they can read a history book.
Alex Trebek: in the movie Prey, the Comanche inhabited the Great northern plains in the early 18th century.
Forum: what is bullshit, Alex.
Alex Trebek: correct, for 400 VT
Forum: yoooo! Alex in the jungle
For how it was received, its not as simple , if you look at a lot of reviews most of them are cookie cutter ones . Ones who scored it high because “racists and sexists” scored it low , its muddy water .
My original point was that anybody who used its “rating” as evidence that a negative opinion is unwarranted, is bullshit .
If the people that said ratings mattered say that they don’t matter if it doesn’t support them , thats more mud in the water . So I will go by how I viewed it.
Do your criticism really hurt the reviews tho? Most agree that the movie is enjoyable. Should it be scored lower because it’s mit historically and scientifically accurate and because the heroine is woke?
