I said from the devs perspective not mine
I could say the same to you. Were both dead sure of our perspectives trying to convince the other.
Besides I offered a chance to go to the next topic. If you really believe I’m not budging agree to disagree and start off your next complaint and see if that fairs any better.
Same here
I literally gave the reasoning behind it. Games are eabout interactivity blah blah blah
Direct quote please tell me the hotel with this logic?
If you die your time isn’t wasted. You just go off on the next match no downtime. You get camped it’s two minutes of your life wasted. If you weren’t camped then your just waiting for a chance to come back in which facilitates the pace of the match.
For dbd the community has used the same words to mean different things.
The term camping originated from pitching a tent up in the forest. You can’t Grammer police gaming slang. Besides this conversation doesn’t change the actual gameplay.
We’re arguing about should it be viable.
I used it once to describe your popularity fallacy. A fallacy where you use the opinion of large group of people rather than logical arguments.
What middle ground is there?
I don’t think camping is good gameplay
I gave that it’s not the killers fault
I gave that using stealth killers to bait a down is a smart use of camping
We agreed camping sucked
If those aren’t middle grounds what is there?
That is true. Like I said in the top of the post I’m coming back because of a massive balance patch nerfing gens and a lot of survivors perks.
Anyways I’ll extend the offer one more time. Right now neither of are convinced. So let’s move on to the next topic with our opinions on the topic in mind