I think

#42

LOL

Good talk

I can’t go on with this charade any longer however

I don’t actually think there should be an actual Purge

I’m just excited to see the new movie Friday 😅

1 Like
#43

True but why have it be illegal anyways?

#44

Pistols at dawn

Or

Knife fight

Or

Pure hand to hand

2 Likes
#45

I CHALLENGE YOU TO A DUEL

2 Likes
#46

I didn’t know you play Chivalry II

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED!!

2 Likes
#47

Because people are too stupid.

2 Likes
#48

Then let them be stupid

I mean we could remove the safety warnings off of bleach first so we don’t have to worry about dumb people.

Or we could just allow them to duel and do the same thing.

#49

Sorry man, while I kinda agree, I just dont think ppl should be killing each other on reflex.

I’m already tired of all the shootings we hear about

1 Like
#50

Mike Tyson would’ve been modern day Spartacus if they just let him kill people. Poland could put all that larping and full contact sword fighting to use for sure.

lmao

2 Likes
#51

Tyson was legit the embodiment of hatred and insecurity. There was no stopping iron Mike in his prime and his reign remains legendary, he would have taken countless lives if given the chance and tbh society would be frothing at the mouth to see more. Dude was a scumbag, but a phenom in raw aggression… there’s plenty more like him, they just ain’t into boxing.

Think of all the actual mercenaries in the world, those roided out testosterone monsters they send in under the radar to rape and massacre zones. Throw all the big baddies in the world into an arena and let’s watch the brutality unfold as society collapses around us lol

1 Like
#52

There are many things to consider tho…

Will health insurance cover the winners injuries?
If you are injured, will you get paid time off of werk or are you likely to get fired?
Would there be a rise in psychological disorders (anxiety, pstd, etc)?
How should funeral costs for the loser be handled?
There might be a need for participants to have a living will.
Would self defence be considered concent?
Etc …

3 Likes
#53

This.
This is the kinda stuff that needs to be considered.

2 Likes
#54

No the fuck it doesn’t lol!

If two adults consent to a duel then the losers family is out of Luck, and the winner has to deal with any and all injuries themselves. Also fuck the winner bitch better be at work the next day or use his sick days fuck that! His job didn’t participate in the duel!!! @Anyt1m3

2 Likes
#55

Look who you tryna duel?
Who touched you?

XD

1 Like
#56

Nobody!! The law system is too bogged down with stupid civil matters that it fails to do it Duty!

I think civil matter such as a neighbor dispute over land, or a family member goes out of there way to cause harm to u or others in the family, or that coworker who is a snitch! Should be handled by each party in a consensual duel

#57

What do you mean the law system is too bogged down by civil matters?

I dont see why a duel tho.

I just dont trust anybody with deciding matters of life and death.
I mean here on this forum we see a lot of delusional people who would needlessly want a duel.

Idk I just dont take it lightly is all.

1 Like
#58

Fair. What would happen if one person injures the other to the point that they cannot fight, but refuses to kill?

1 Like
#59

Yeah but the other person has to consent to it tho!
So if the other party says nah! Then said challenger has to accept that!

#60

At least theres that.

1 Like
#61

Mhmmm? I guess the rule would have to be set for a clear fair duel where the winner has to finish his or her or there opponent