The difference between anything over 60hz/fps is negligible
Revisiting PC low graphics Aug 2021
Me
Sounds like something a peasant would say.
Itās true
Total overkill
You canāt tell the difference between 60 and 67 fps?
Pshhhhhh peasant ;)
One of the many neurosis many PC gamers suffer from
Well in some games, thatās true, if you have 60Hz monitor.
In games like Counter Strike, you can clearly see the difference while playing when you have 60 fps and letās say 200 on the same monitor.
I was going to make a similar point. As long as you can track the predator when they leap, more frames doesnāt really help much. At 30 frames, itās not quite enough, but at 60 frames itās already more than enough.
I couldnāt tell the difference
Well I could but it was negligible
Maybe because I donāt have robot eyes?
Letās be real here
Weāre talking about fractions of a second
Playing at 60fps is complete garbage.
I said what I said.
It doesnāt matter if you could or not, Iām just stating how it is with Counter Strike as an example. People who play it on competitive level, they chase fps above 200, but if you play it for a few hours every week, you probably wonāt care about that and youāll stick with 60.
If I paid a bunch of money for a computer that could run more than 60 frames, Iād probably say the same thing too.
Itās probably marketing that convinces people that they need so many frames per second to play video games.
I have all the frames and Iām not giving them up for anything.
We must not encourage this neurotic behavior
Itās not healthy
Then I will take them
By force if necessary
What neurotic behaviour?
Google it yourself if you think that Iām making this shit up.
Iāve played counter strike (although Iāve always preferred day of defeat) for many years
I know all about it
The neurotic behavior is obsession over fps when the difference is negligible at best
You will try but youāll never be able to keep up.
Curse you base ps4!!!
laughs in overwhelming frames per second

