Revisiting PC low graphics Aug 2021
1 Like
Sure. Because counter strike is a weird corner peaking shooter. I canāt even watch the gameplay. Thereās very little relation to real physics with that game. Every tiny reaction speed advantage makes a difference. In most other games, it wonāt make a significant difference.
We perceive every day life in a fluid motion, unlike how screens display images in fps. 60fps is more fluid than 30fps, same as 120fps is more fluid than 60fps. The higher the fps, the more ālife-likeā of an experience youāll get. Whether that impacts youāre game performance or not, there is no denying that the more fps the more fluidity youāll perceive.
And for some gamers, fluidity matters more than image quality.
WHERE DOES IT END??!!
It never ends
Perpetual neurosis
You poor fool
š
It ends when the lights go out
1 Like
Thatās what Iāve been trying to explain to BadBlood about CS.
Some games profit from high fps and you can notice the difference in smoothness, in some other games, the difference is small.
Usually itās good to have high fps in fast paced games, but if youāre gonna play games like Football Manager, it doesnāt matter if you have 60 or 200 fps on 60Hz monitor.
1 Like
well thank you captain obviousā¦ Never crossed my mind that changing graphics settings will actually make a visual differenceā¦ how stupid of meā¦ *<:o)
I used to play with a pc player and when I brought up the graphics issue he just laughed , he said himself and close friends dont have good pc/laptops and they played it on average or above graphics š¤
Iāve acknowledge thereās a difference
Itās just negligible at best
1 Like
Negligible for you bro. Not everyone is the same.
If we were, all of us would run the same setups and played at 60 fps or whatever works.
1 Like
You just explained why they play on average or above average settings, because their pcs are crap so it doesnāt matter to them because more than likely they have shit monitors as well.
Even the human eye is limited in this respect.
Scientific studies support a definitive improvement in our perception from 30 FPS to 60, but more than 60 FPS is inconclusive. Most people probably plateau at around 90 FPS and 200 FPS is nearly indistinguishable from real life.
curious (genuinely, not looking to start another fight)
What CPU/GPU/RES/HZ you have and what is the max fps you get?
Also, do you get constant FPS or does it drop like crazy during certain scenarios?
Iām considering upgrading to a 3070Ti when they drop in price, but if that aināt gonna give me constant 144 fps at 1440P using cinematic settings, Iāll probably wonāt upgrade because all my other games run like butter except for PHG
Itās like asking why do you need a Lamborghini to drive to work if its gonna take you the same time to get there as the person driving a Camry?
Bro I can tell you right away you can clearly see the difference between 60fps and 144fps
Is as noticeable as going from 30 to 60. But when you are used to 60, is hard to tell. After a few months playing at 144, going down to 60 feels likeā¦ ugh. You can see the choppines and stuttering that you once saw as butter smooth
1 Like
That article youāve read also explains the differences in experience youāll get when playing at high fps as I stated before.
And you see how you brought up a number, letās assume 200fps is the limit. So we can agree that there is a difference between 60hz monitor and 144hz monitor. I would go as far as saying that 240hz would probably be the max, anything above that is probably indistinguishable by most people.
I donāt think it will.
I had 3060 Ti overclocked with Ryzen 5600x, 3600MHz 16GB, most settings on high, some settings were on cinematic, fps unlocked, 1080p 60Hz.
I could see random drops from 340+ fps to 140 fps on random parts of the map, especially on Excavation.
I doubt that youāll have constant 144 fps on your res with everything on cinematic. This game is just poorly optimized.