I admit I didn’t bother to read other ppl’s posts but here’s my take:
You kinda have a point, I thought about that too…
But you gotta remember that they are Predators /Hunters. Not warriors, not gladiators.
That means that they are out to kill and bring some trophies home, period. And both in nature and among humans you’ll never find a hunter that exposes himself to the point where the confrontation becomes a “fair” sport.
So in this sense, I see Yautja honour code simply as a deliberate form of self imposed restriction, not some kind of “human-like ethic” nor an “animals rights” type of thing.
To me it’s almost like a hunter with his rifle that is out to kill some big cat, and (suppose we are outside of human society and laws) decides to give himself some rules, e.g. using weapons with a level of destructive/stopping power that is not excessive, no special protection, no vehicle etc…
But even when these deliberate rules are in place, it doesn’t necessarily mean he will let the animal see him, at least not when he is within a certain distance, or put himself in a particularly risky situation.
It’s more about making it more challenging for themselves, than to respect their prey.
So in essence: yes, you are right, they are not honourable in a human-moral sense, their honour code is not like the samurai honour code (the latter were warriors, not hunters. Also: one more reason to stop trying to equate the two parties, despite the bushido was an “inspiration”. Read: Fuck samurai predator)
BUT its still somewhat an honour code, with its own particular logic.